Re: [osg-users] segfault: particle/threads

2009-02-06 Thread Melchior FRANZ
Hi, * Robert Osfield -- Friday 06 February 2009: > The code in osgParticle::ParticleSystemUpdater has changed very little > over the past two years, so I think it's unlikely to be a specific > problem with osgParticle in OSG2.8/svn/trunk, I didn't claim that it's a particle bug -- just that it r

Re: [osg-users] segfault: particle/threads (was: Re: svn/trunk ready to make OpenSceneGraph-2.8 branch, please do last build test of snv/trunk :-))

2009-02-06 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Melchior, The code in osgParticle::ParticleSystemUpdater has changed very little over the past two years, so I think it's unlikely to be a specific problem with osgParticle in OSG2.8/svn/trunk, or if it is a problem in osgParticle then it's been hidden away for a long time. Unfortunately this

Re: [osg-users] segfault: particle/threads

2009-02-06 Thread Paul Melis
Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 03 February 2009: Just for the record: I've had several segfaults in OSG's particle code (threading related) since I updated a few days ago. I'll post a backtrace when I run into it again. Linux 2.6.28.3, P4/32bit, gcc 4.3.1, osg r9631,

[osg-users] segfault: particle/threads (was: Re: svn/trunk ready to make OpenSceneGraph-2.8 branch, please do last build test of snv/trunk :-))

2009-02-05 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 03 February 2009: > Just for the record: I've had several segfaults in OSG's > particle code (threading related) since I updated a few > days ago. I'll post a backtrace when I run into it again. Linux 2.6.28.3, P4/32bit, gcc 4.3.1, osg r9631, FlightGear. (The warnings i