Hi,
* Robert Osfield -- Friday 06 February 2009:
> The code in osgParticle::ParticleSystemUpdater has changed very little
> over the past two years, so I think it's unlikely to be a specific
> problem with osgParticle in OSG2.8/svn/trunk,
I didn't claim that it's a particle bug -- just that it r
Hi Melchior,
The code in osgParticle::ParticleSystemUpdater has changed very little
over the past two years, so I think it's unlikely to be a specific
problem with osgParticle in OSG2.8/svn/trunk, or if it is a problem in
osgParticle then it's been hidden away for a long time. Unfortunately
this
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 03 February 2009:
Just for the record: I've had several segfaults in OSG's
particle code (threading related) since I updated a few
days ago. I'll post a backtrace when I run into it again.
Linux 2.6.28.3, P4/32bit, gcc 4.3.1, osg r9631,
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 03 February 2009:
> Just for the record: I've had several segfaults in OSG's
> particle code (threading related) since I updated a few
> days ago. I'll post a backtrace when I run into it again.
Linux 2.6.28.3, P4/32bit, gcc 4.3.1, osg r9631, FlightGear.
(The warnings i
4 matches
Mail list logo