Hi Brian,
CMake "shouldn't" find WxWidgets. Could you try rm CMakeCache.txt and
then rerun ./configure, and then if you still get the error send us
the CMakeCache.txt, perhaps this might gleen something.
Robert.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Brian Keener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Updated f
Robert Osfield wrote:
> CMake "shouldn't" find WxWidgets. Could you try rm CMakeCache.txt and
> then rerun ./configure, and then if you still get the error send us
> the CMakeCache.txt, perhaps this might gleen something.
I actually deleted my whole build directory and redid it (twice I think)
b
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Brian Keener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Osfield wrote:
>> CMake "shouldn't" find WxWidgets. Could you try rm CMakeCache.txt and
>> then rerun ./configure, and then if you still get the error send us
>> the CMakeCache.txt, perhaps this might gleen something
Robert Osfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Brian Keener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Robert Osfield wrote:
> >> CMake "shouldn't" find WxWidgets. Could you try rm CMakeCache.txt and
> >> then rerun ./configure, and then if you still get the error send us
> >> the CMakeCache.txt, p
Hi Brian,
I tried twice to send this replay with the CmakeCache.txt as an attachment and
keep getting this message - I am now this without the attachment to see if
that is the problem.
Your two posts came through, but were empty for some reason (no text, no
attachment, just the headers - to
wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> > I tried twice to send this replay with the CmakeCache.txt as an attachment
> > and
> > keep getting this message - I am now this without the attachment to see if
> > that is the problem.
>
> Your two posts came through, but were empty for some reason (no text, no
>
Hi Brian,
Hmmm, must have been the attachment since you saw everything on this one.
Attachment was only 47kb - you wouldn't think that would be a stopper unless it was
just the fact it had an attachment.
Weird, I remember bigger attachments being sent to osg-users (screen
captures, etc.)...
wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> > Hmmm, must have been the attachment since you saw everything on this one.
> > Attachment was only 47kb - you wouldn't think that would be a stopper
> > unless it was
> > just the fact it had an attachment.
>
> Weird, I remember bigger attachments being sent to osg-us
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the help. Should be another blank one there now where I just tried posting
the same file as a zip but that was refused too.
Yep. Sorry...
I'll wait and see what Robert says - I guess I could put the whole CmakeCache.txt
in-line in a message.
That would work I'd gue
For what it's worth... the whole messages are coming through for me but
they are just not visible. If I view the message source then I can see
the contents... including the encoded attachment. I'm not sure why
Thunderbird is getting confused by them.
It's weird because other posters seem to
Brian
Maybe you can try sending the attachment from different mail account?
Guy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Speed
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:33 AM
To: OpenSceneGraph Users
Subject: Re: [osg-users] Build from svn in Cygwin
I somehow managed to decode the file. I hope it is the whole file.
# This is the CMakeCache file.
# For build in directory: /usr/develop/obj/osg
# It was generated by CMake: /usr/bin/cmake.exe
# You can edit this file to change values found and used by cmake.
# If you do not want to change any of t
Hello Paul,
For what it's worth... the whole messages are coming through for me but
they are just not visible. If I view the message source then I can see
the contents... including the encoded attachment. I'm not sure why
Thunderbird is getting confused by them.
Hey, you're right. Weird, f
Jean-Sébastien Guay wrote:
> So I would probably blame an e-mail client bug. Brian, what client are
> you using and can you try another one? (but we're pretty far from OSG
> support/discussion here :-) )
>
> Just trying to be helpful...
I'm suspecting the email client now - it is an open source
Alberto Luaces wrote:
> I somehow managed to decode the file. I hope it is the whole file
whoa - good job!
Size 47481 bytes
md5sum 66b6269f412416423aaf06f3c9b14706
bk
___
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.opensc
Paul Speed wrote:
> For what it's worth... the whole messages are coming through for me but
> they are just not visible. If I view the message source then I can see
> the contents... including the encoded attachment. I'm not sure why
> Thunderbird is getting confused by them.
I posted to the
Jean-Sébastien Guay wrote:
> > The only thing I can find different about your messages upon quick
> > glance is that the Content-Type: boundary designator is very high in the
> > header. And it contains a line break... which in my limited experience
> > seems a little odd. As does the ":thesof
Paul Speed wrote:
> The only thing I can find different about your messages upon quick
> glance is that the Content-Type: boundary designator is very high in the
> header. And it contains a line break... which in my limited experience
> seems a little odd. As does the ":thesoftwaresource.com"
Hi Brian,
Cmake is finding WxWidgets, there are plenty of entires lists in your
CMakeCache.txt file (which came through first time for me BTW), for
instance:
//wxWidgets_LIB_DIR
WX_LIB_DIR:INTERNAL=D:/wxWidgets-2.8.7/lib/vc_lib
//wxWidgets_ROOT_DIR
WX_ROOT_DIR:INTERNAL=D:/wxWidgets-2.8.7
//Advanc
Robert Osfield wrote:
> Cmake is finding WxWidgets, there are plenty of entires lists in your
> CMakeCache.txt file (which came through first time for me BTW), for
> instance:
I don't understand why some see it and others don't but glad it worked for you.
Caused a bit of discussion with the Vir
Hi Brian,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Brian Keener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So perhaps the problem in build is down to a different WxWidgets
>> version than the OSG can compile against, or not all the lib/includes
>> matching up for some reason. Disabling WxWdiget should be possible by
Robert Osfield wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Brian Keener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> So perhaps the problem in build is down to a different WxWidgets
> >> version than the OSG can compile against, or not all the lib/includes
> >> matching up for some reason. Disabling WxWdiget sh
22 matches
Mail list logo
