Re: [osg-users] [help] osgProducer was gone.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Osfield wrote: > On 6/15/07, Doug McCorkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You might want to give ProducerOSG a try. I am sure the folks on the >> producer users list could give you some insight on converting to the >> new library. > > Convert to

Re: [osg-users] [help] osgProducer was gone.

On 6/15/07, Doug McCorkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You might want to give ProducerOSG a try. I am sure the folks on the producer users list could give you some insight on converting to the new library. Convert to osgViewer or ProducerOSG... let me see Which do you think supports the core

Re: [osg-users] [help] osgProducer was gone.

El Viernes 15 Junio 2007, Doug McCorkle escribió: > On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:42 PM, Kim Yongho wrote: > > Hi guys. > > > > I deleted osg ver1.2. :-( > > Now. I compiled osg ver1.9.9. I think it works well. :- ) > > All of my ex features use "osgProducer", but there is no > > osgProducer in new versi

Re: [osg-users] [help] osgProducer was gone.

On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:42 PM, Kim Yongho wrote: Hi guys. I deleted osg ver1.2. :-( Now. I compiled osg ver1.9.9. I think it works well. :- ) All of my ex features use "osgProducer", but there is no osgProducer in new version. so I need your help.(becase two lib have a little difference, I

[osg-users] [help] osgProducer was gone.

Hi guys. I deleted osg ver1.2. :-( Now. I compiled osg ver1.9.9. I think it works well. :- ) All of my ex features use "osgProducer", but there is no osgProducer in new version. so I need your help.(becase two lib have a little difference, I can't adjust well :- () "ex code" used osgPr