Re: [osg-users] Copyright law/Relicensing OpenThreads (was Re: [osg-submissions] OS X Implementation of OpenThreads::GetNumberOfProcessors())

2007-02-08 Thread Jan Ciger
Hello, On Thursday 08 February 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "However, if any of Your contributions are included into the Software, > they will become part of the Software and will be > distributed under the terms and conditions of this License. Further, if > Your donated Contributions are inte

Re: [osg-users] Copyright law/Relicensing OpenThreads (was Re: [osg-submissions] OS X Implementation of OpenThreads::GetNumberOfProcessors())

2007-02-08 Thread andrew_lorino
I haven't had much experience dealing with these kind of issues, but maybe this can help some. The license that we (SCEA) use for the COLLADA DOM has a special clause about providing contributions that eliminates this potential copyright problem. Something similar might be able to work for OSG, Pro

[osg-users] Copyright law/Relicensing OpenThreads (was Re: [osg-submissions] OS X Implementation of OpenThreads::GetNumberOfProcessors())

2007-02-08 Thread E. Wing
> By the way, if you relicense OpenThreads, I think you need to make > sure every single contributor that has changes in the current code > base agrees to the license change or their changes must be pulled from > the source base. (I remember PhysFS went through this and it was quite > an ordeal fo