Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-08 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Chuck, On 2/8/07, Chuck Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've updated to the current CVS versions and I'm currently rebuilding the debug and release versions. Apparently, there were a lot of modifications that were checked in after I got a CVS update last night. So, I wanted to get those mod

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-08 Thread Chuck Cole
Behalf Of Robert Osfield Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:12 AM To: osg users Subject: Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test Hi Chuck, On 2/7/07, Chuck Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Once the viewer locks up, I have to kill the process. The display no longer responds to key press

Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-08 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Chuck, On 2/7/07, Chuck Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Once the viewer locks up, I have to kill the process. The display no longer responds to key presses or mouse movements. Also, I disabled hyperthreading and I got the same results (locks up on first press of 'm'). I'll rebuild the deb

Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-08 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Zach, Thanks for the feedback. The debugger problem is odd, osgViewer is just C++ with a bit of Win32 code in the GraphicsWindowWin32.cpp implementation. I wonder if they build options are have a an error that is throwing off the VS7 compiler/debugger. Perhaps its just down to bugs in VS7.

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Zach Deedler
Updates in red. INVESTIGATION continued... 1) Lock up with Pentium D 3.2GHz dual core with hyperthreading, Windows XP (this looks like 4 procs in the task manager). 2) All tests done with 'osgviewer cow.osg', then pressing 'm' 3) see below 4) see below 5) Lock up with Pentium D 2.8GHz dual core

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Chuck Cole
ht and try some more debugging tomorrow. chuck _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Osfield Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:21 PM To: osg users Subject: Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test Hi Chuck, Are able to exit cleanly? What happens

Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Robert Osfield
e windows implementation of the threading models? Zach -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Zach Deedler Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 15:29 To: 'osg users' Subject: RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Zach Deedler
s about 5GB of space with VisualStudio 7, and a long time to compile. Zach _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Cole Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 16:58 To: 'osg users' Subject: RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test I tried the updated osgvi

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Chuck Cole
t. chuck _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Osfield Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 4:17 PM To: osg users Subject: Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test Hi Zach, There is chance that its Windows threading issue, but more likely a general threa

Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Robert Osfield
On 2/7/07, Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All my changes are checked in. Where abouts are you getting the compile error? I have just updated the wrappers as these will have been out of sync with my earlier changes to CullStack. If you are still getting errors on include/osg/CullSta

Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Robert Osfield
HI Zach, On 2/7/07, Zach Deedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, Looks like I need an update to osg::CullStack header file? I'm getting these compile errors saying that osg::CullStack::pushModelViewMatrix does not take 2 arguments, and its defined with one argument in the header file.

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Zach Deedler
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Osfield Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 16:17 To: osg users Subject: Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test Hi Zach, There is chance that its Windows threading issue, but more likely a general threading issue. Unfortuantely, I don't have enough cor

Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Robert Osfield
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Zach Deedler Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 15:29 To: 'osg users' Subject: RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test INVESTIGATION continued 3) This is the DEBUG_INFO output till where it get stuck: .

Re: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Robert Osfield
HI Zach, It looks like the new thread isn't started up correctly for some reason. What OS/Machine are you using? What are screen setup do you have, how many windows is osgviewer opening up? I'll add some more debug info on what thread model its setting up. DrawThreadPerContext and ThreadPerCam

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Zach Deedler
n of the threading models? Zach -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zach Deedler Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 15:29 To: 'osg users' Subject: RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test INVESTIGATION continued 3) This is the DEBUG_INFO outp

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Chuck Cole
I have the same problem, but figured it was due probably to the osgviewer being in such a state of flux (that and I hadn't really had the time to investigate further). But, seeing your post, I wanted to at least add that I experience the same thing. As far as PC configuration, I have a Pentium 3.

RE: [osg-users] CVS performance test

2007-02-07 Thread Zach Deedler
INVESTIGATION continued 3) This is the DEBUG_INFO output till where it get stuck: increment SwapBuffers Doing op SwapBuffers 00F8E418 get op 0 00F8E418 increment RunOperation Doing op RunOperation 00F8E418 Doing op Render 00F346C0 Viewer::stopThreading() - stopping threading ViewerDoubleBuffer