Editorial: An Insecure Nation Virtually Unprotected

Published: June 2, 2005

When the East Coast and Midwest were hit by a blackout in 2003, the first
fear of many people was that terrorists had attacked the electricity grid.
It turned out not to have been terrorism, but the fears were well founded.
Experts have long warned that the nation's power, transportation and
communications systems are vulnerable to "cyberattacks" that could devastate
the economy and cause huge damage to life and property. Now a new government
report has concluded that far too little is being done to close these gaps.

After Sept. 11, 2001, a group of leading scientists sent a stern warning to
President Bush about the danger of a computer-based terrorist attack on the
nation's infrastructure. They called for the creation of a major
Cyber-Warfare Defense Project, modeled on the Manhattan Project, to prevent,
detect and respond to potential attacks. "Fast and resolute mitigating
action is needed to avoid national disaster," the scientists warned.

Power grids, water treatment and distribution systems, major dams, and oil
and chemical refineries are all controlled today by networked computers.
Computers make the nation's infrastructure far more efficient, but they also
make it more vulnerable. A well-planned cyberattack could black out large
parts of the country, cut off water supplies or worse. The Nuclear
Regulatory Commission found that in 2003 a malicious, invasive program
called the Slammer worm infected the computer network at a nuclear power
plant and disabled its safety monitoring system for nearly five hours.

Despite the warnings after 9/11 - and again after the 2003 blackout -
disturbingly little has been done. The Government Accountability Office did
a rigorous review of the Department of Homeland Security's progress on every
aspect of computer security, and its findings are not reassuring. It found
that the department has not yet developed assessments of the threat of a
cyberattack or of how vulnerable major computer systems are to such an
attack, nor has it created plans for recovering key Internet functions in
case of an attack. The report also expressed concern that many of the
department's senior cybersecurity officials have left in the past year.
Representative Zoe Lofgren, the California Democrat who was among those who
requested the G.A.O. report, said last week that it proved that "a national
plan to secure our cybernetworks is virtually nonexistent."

Protecting the nation from a potentially devastating cyberattack is not
easy. The technological challenges are considerable - even major technology
companies have trouble defending themselves against hackers. The number of
potential targets is enormous. And because many of the targets are in
private hands, the Department of Homeland Security has to work with entities
that may be reluctant to follow the government's lead.

But overcoming these obstacles should be a high priority. One of the lessons
of the Sept. 11 attacks in New York and Washington was how much damage a few
men with simple weapons, like box cutters, could do if they targeted a point
of maximum vulnerability. In a well-planned cyberattack, a single terrorist
with nothing more than a computer and Internet access could do an
extraordinary amount of harm from half a world away.

Source:
<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/02/opinion/opinionspecial/02thu1.html?th&emc
=th&oref=login>
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/02/opinion/opinionspecial/02thu1.html?th&emc=
th&oref=login



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to