Anti-Islamist Rally Banned in Brussels          
By  <http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/authors.aspx?Name=Vasko
Kohlmayer> Vasko Kohlmayer
FrontPageMagazine.com | 8/22/2007 
 
<http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=5BA45BF2-4BE8-4696-B48
3-1BAF74DE199E>
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=5BA45BF2-4BE8-4696-B483
-1BAF74DE199E

An eagerly awaited public rally was to take place in Brussels - the capital
of the European Union - on September 11 of this year. Called 'Against
Islamisation of Europe,' its intent was to protest the spreading of Islamic
sharia law across the European continent and honor by a minute of silence
the victims of the 9/11 terror attacks. 

The event was being organized by  <http://sioe.wordpress.com/> SIOE (Stop
the Islamisation of Europe), an alliance of people from across Europe whose
objective is to prevent Islam from 'becoming a dominant political force in
Europe.' Concerned about the Muslim subversion of the continent's cultures
and institutions, SIOE's has  <http://sioe.wordpress.com/about> this to say
about Islam: 


No other religion demands more from those who do not adhere to its doctrine.
This would not be a problem if our leaders actually stood up for Western
values and insisted that Muslims live within our laws and accepted our
cultures and social systems. Instead, it is we who are told we must abandon
our values, cultures and societies in order not to offend Muslims. It is
Islam that is being rammed down our throats and the throats of our children.
It is not only in the West that Islam is causing misery and mayhem. All
around the world Islam is battling the "infidels".

In a clear sign of public support for the planned demonstration, 20,000
people from across Europe have pledged their participation. 

But now it looks the event will not be allowed to proceed. On August 13,
Brussels' Mayor Freddy Thielemans, a socialist, made the decision not to
issue a permit for the march.

The Mayor's decision is a very unusual one, because Brussels is known as a
demonstration friendly city. In fact, it is the demonstration capital of the
world with two or three events taking place on average every day. In the
last six years alone, the Mayor's office has received 3,600 requests for
public protest permits of which only 6 have been denied.

But the Mayor is trying to do more than just stop people from voicing their
concerns about the ongoing Islamization of their culture. This is what he
<http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2337> wrote on August 20 in an op-ed
piece in the Belgian newspaper
<http://www.standaard.be/kanaal/index.aspx?kanaalid=465> De Standaard: 


First and foremost the organizers have chosen the symbolic date of 9/11. The
intention is obviously to confound the terrorist activities of Muslim
extremists on the one hand and Islam as a religion and all Muslims on the
other hand. [.] Such incitement to discrimination and hatred, which we
usually call racism and xenophobia, is forbidden by a considerable number of
international treaties and is punished by our penal laws and by European
legislation. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly pronounced
judgments condemning this type of acts.

In what is a truly surreal development, a European public official calls
those concerned about the encroachment of Islam on their life extremists and
threatens criminal prosecution if they don't desist.

The Mayor's concern about extremism is very selective, however. In December
of 2004, for example, he allowed a demonstration to proceed where more than
20,000 Iranians
<http://terror-watch.blogspot.com/2004/12/voice-of-iran-terrorists-rally-in.
html> protested against the inclusion of People's Mojahedin Organization of
Iran in EU's list of terrorist organizations. This is how this group was
once  <http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_cr/h920428-terror-pmoi.htm>
described by the US Department of State: 


The Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), a leftist revolutionary group, was formed in
1963. Its founding principles included the creation of a Marxist-oriented
Islamic government in Iran; opposition to 'imperialism' as supposedly
embodied by the United States; opposition to Zionism and Israel; and a close
affinity to Third World radical movements. [.] To achieve its political
objectives, the MEK almost from its inception has engaged in acts of
terrorism and violence; the organization was responsible for fatal attacks
on several Americans in Iran in the 1970s. 

Not only was the demonstration allowed to go on - it took place in front of
the EU's headquarters - it received extensive official backing. Numerous
speeches were made by European parliamentarians and various public
personalities seeking to remove the group's terror designation. 

This makes for a remarkable situation: In the EU capital, Iranian Muslims
are allowed to show their solidarity with a questionable organization while
native citizens are being turned into criminals for seeking to voice their
concerns about the unfolding Islamic takeover of their lands.

To add insult to injury, on the very day the organizers of the 9/11 rally
were protesting the decision to block the event, Mayor Thielemans approved a
permit for another demonstration to take place on September 9. Organized by
an alliance of 'various truth, peace and human right movements in Europe'
calling themselves  <http://www.virb.com/unitedfortruth> United for Truth,
they claim that the 9/11 attacks were staged by the Bush administration with
possible support from some European governments. A message posted on their
website on July 30 reads in part:  

Recently the French Minister for Housing and the City Mme Christine Boutin
expressed her doubts about the official 9/11 report. Before, Michael
Meacher, secretary of state in Britain and Andreas Von Bulow, ex Minister
from Germany, stated clearly that 9/11 and the war on terror are
orchestrated by the Bush administration. Prof. David Ray Griffin held on
September 14th, 2006 a lecture ('Should the truth be revealed or concealed')
in Copenhagen. In this lecture he asked for a European investigation to the
facts of September 11, 2001. To make this demand stronger, the United for
truth organization in Belgium is organizing a European protest rally through
Brussels. [.] They [protesters] agree the 9/11 attacks and other terrorist
acts, no matter if they were carried out by some so-called Afghan cavemen or
by the governments themselves, inflicted the current policy of fear.

It is hard to believe that in Europe Muslims and far-left radicals are
allowed to march in support of their causes and inane theories while those
concerned about the ongoing disintegration of their societies are not only
being silenced but threatened with legal action.

The controversy surrounding the planned 9/11 rally in Brussels is emblematic
of Europe's rapid descent into madness. Today Europe is a place where things
are turned upside down and where common sense is not only commonly
disregarded but actively suppressed.

Having lost both its sense of identity and sanity, Europe stands on the
brink of being overtaken by Muslims who may well be able to claim their
prize without so much as a fight. Brussels' socialist Mayor Freddy
Thielemans is only one of many among Europe's leftist elites who are not
only willing to capitulate to the barbarian invaders of our age but are
actively facilitating their progress. America better take heed, for these
are the very people its own liberals admire and in whose steps they would
like to follow.

 

BUT:


Pro-Hezbollah Group Will Demonstrate in Brussels on 9/11

>From the desk of  <http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/paulbelien> Paul
Belien on Thu, 2007-08-23 11:38
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2347

The  <http://www.arabeuropean.org/> Arab-European League (AEL), a pro-
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah> Hezbollah organization of Arab
immigrants in Belgium and the Netherlands, is rallying its members to march
in Brussels on 11 September "against Islamophobia and racism in Europe." The
AEL demonstration is a response to the request by the Danish-British-German
organization  <http://sioe.wordpress.com/> Stop the Islamisation of Europe
(SIOE) for permission to demonstrate on 9/11 in front of the European
Union's buildings in Brussels against the introduction of Sharia laws in
Europe.

 bruessel_flugblatt-small.jpg
<http://www.brusselsjournal.com/files/bruessel_flugblatt-small.jpg> 

Two weeks ago the  <http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/node/2312> SIOE
demonstration was banned by Freddy Thielemans, the mayor of Brussels.
According to Mr Thielemans the SIOE demonstration is
<http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/node/2337> a criminal offence because
it "incite[s] to discrimination and hatred, which we usually call racism and
xenophobia. [This] is forbidden by a considerable number of international
treaties and is punished by our penal laws and by the European legislation."

SIOE has  <http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/node/2330> initiated an
appeal against the mayor's ban before the Belgian Council of State. The CoS
is expected to issue its verdict next week. Last week Mayor Thielemans
<http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/node/2331> gave permission for a
demonstration in Brussels on 9 September by United for Truth (UfT), a group
which claims that the terror attacks of 9/11/2001 on the WTC towers in NY
and on the Pentagon were organized by the American government.

On its website  <http://www.virb.com/unitedfortruth/blog/223238> UfT writes
that the Brussels authorities, before giving permission for the UfT
demonstration, checked that the demonstration would not address religious
topics. "The biggest issue was if there was any possible conflict [of our
demonstration] with religion. As we just base ourselves on facts and
political issues, we have no intention to discriminate or promote any
religion."

Yesterday the Arab-European League issued a press release emphasizing that
its own demonstration on 11 September, which so far has not received the
mayor's permission (Thielemans is waiting for the advice of the police),
will not criticize any religion. "The AEL respects everyone's religious
convictions, culture and language [.]. The demand for respect for every
religious conviction is the central theme [of the demonstration]." The AEL
says that freedom of expression is an absolute right, stressing that the
organization did not ask for the SIOE demo to be forbidden. "However, the
right to have one's religious convictions, culture and language respected is
an equally absolute right."

The AEL was founded in Belgium in 2000. Its founder, Lebanese-born
Hezbollah-member  <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyab_Abou_Jahjah> Dyab Abu
Jahjah, has called the 9/11/2001 attacks "sweet revenge." Following the
<http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/node/382> Danish cartoon affair the
AEL, advocating unrestricted freedom of speech,
<http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/node/790> published anti-Semitic
cartoons which deny the Holocaust. Though such denial is illegal in Belgium,
the Belgian authorities failed to take any action. The AEL also demands that
Arabic be recognized as an official language in Belgium.

The organization says it stands for
<http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/node/1183> three basic demands.
"Bilingual education for Arab-speaking kids, hiring quotas that protect
Muslims, and the right to keep our cultural customs."
<http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/89> According to Jahjah
"Assimilation is cultural rape. It means renouncing your identity, becoming
like the others." In 2002 an AEL demonstration in Antwerp led to
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/11/29/wantw29.xml
> street riots and anti-Semitic violence. The AEL wants "the Jewish
community in Antwerp to cease its support of, and distance itself from, the
state of Israel. If not, attacks in Antwerp are almost unpreventable."


 

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to