http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/mladics-record-disto
rted.html

 


June 04, 2011


Distorting History


Why aren't the Bosnian Muslims held to the same standard as the Serb
Christians? Why is this fabricated narrative protected so fiercely? The left
is spitting bullets every time I post on Bosnia. They are so vested in
establishing a militant Islamic state in the heart of Europe. Why?

The American people were fed an endless supply of distortions and deceptions
in order to grease Clinton's war. It began with a lie
<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2007/07/islamic-bosnia-.htm
l> . How long will these human rights activists and international law clowns
ignore the Serbian people and their stories? Refuting the Bosnian Lies.
<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2007/08/refuting-the-bo.htm
l> 

The international community jumped to manufacture a "genocide" of a couple
of hundred people, when real genocides like the millions of Armenians,
Greeks and Assyrians by the Muslims are systematically ignored, demied.
Enough. When does the truth get a hearing? Scroll here
<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pamelageller> .

This letter in the Edmunton Journal speaks truth to lie:

Mladic's record distorted

Edmonton Journal May 31, 2011

Re: "Mladic trial a time for Balkan truth," Opinion, May 28.

Thanks for the ambitious headline: "Mladic trial a time for Balkan truth."

We can only wish that truth were the goal of The Hague.

The Journal says that "Unquestionably, justice is the prime imperative
behind the arrest and coming trial of the Balkans' dreadful Ratko Mladic."

Using the preface "unquestionably" doesn't make it unquestionable.

The Journal says that "It is true that in the most passionate of conflicts,
nothing will shake some people from false or distorted versions of past
events."

Serbians and the many reputable critics who have witnessed the reporting and
trials that came out of these civil wars will firmly support that statement.
What is a false version of past events? Could it be that changing the
definition of genocide to fit the crime Mladic is accused of is a falsehood?

Thousands of Serbs around Srebrenica were slaughtered, tortured and beheaded
by Muslims based in the Srebrenica "safe haven." There was no question about
who did it: Naser Oric, the leader of the killers, photographed his victims
and bragged to Western journalists. This man got a light sentence -a slap on
the wrist.

Who would believe that Mladic will get a fair trial?

There was never a Serbian plan, much less a Mladic plan, for a greater
Serbia, but sloppy reporters, including The Journal, in using those words.

Anybody can pick up a package of past articles written about the conflicts
and spit it out again. The Journal coyly states that if Mladic is convicted
it will be for specific, verifiable crimes, but he has been convicted again
and again in the press until he is finally being sent to this kangaroo court
to tie things up.

The Serbian people are a dignified, justice-loving people whose story is
ignored.

N. Jakovac, Toronto, Ont.

What the media refuses to report on are the facts.

 
Deutsche Presse-Agentur June 6, 1996
Senior official admits to secret U.N. report on Sarajevo massacre

For the first time, a senior U.N. official has admitted the existence of a
secret U.N. report that blames the Bosnian Moslems for the February 1994
massacre of Moslems at a Sarajevo market.

Yasushi Akashi, the Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and the
former head of the U.N. mission in Bosnia, told the German Press Agency dpa
that the secret report is "no secret."

An international outcry over the massacre, in which 68 civilians perished at
Markale marketplace, led directly to a toughening of Western policy towards
the Serbs, who were widely blamed for the incident.

But there have been persistent rumours at the United Nations ever since that
a U.N. report clearly blamed the Moslems for firing on their own people in
order to create international sympathy and get the West to fight on their
side against the Serbs.

Until Thursday, U.N. officials strongly denied the report existed, even
after it was quoted in press reports.

Akashi told dpa that not only did the first report exist, but that some
journalists already had a copy. He said the details were in a 1995 story by
U.S. journalist David Binder, who quoted from the confidential report.

According to Binder, the report said U.N. peacekeepers were prevented by
Moslem police from entering the site in the aftermath of the explosion. No
doctors were allowed on the scene and the 197 victims were carried away to
hospital within 25 minutes.

After studying the crater left by the mortar shell and the distribution of
the shrapnel, the report concluded that the shell was fired from behind
Moslem lines. U.N. monitors reported no Serbian shelling that day from
points near the marketplace.

The official U.N. report that was subsequently released said the evidence as
to who fired the shell was inconclusive, since it originated from an area
where Moslem and Serb lines were very close. The two reports represented
divergent views, but the United Nations chose to publish the neutral report
and keep the other secret.

The incident led to a NATO ultimatum to Bosnian Serbs to withdraw their
heavy weapons from around Sarajevo.

At the time, Madeleine Albright, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said:
"It's very hard to believe any country would do this to their own people,
and therefore, although we do not exactly know what the facts are, it would
seem to us that the Serbs are the ones that probably have a great deal of
responsibility."

CORROBORATED IN THESE 3 CLOSING PARAGRAPHS OF THIS AKI REPORT from Dec.
2007:
Bosnian Serb leaders have claimed that the attack was engineered by Bosnian
Muslim forces to lay blame on the Serbs and some UN officials in Bosnia have
speculated that it may have been the case. 

[Dragomir] Milosevic has argued that Muslim forces were entrenched in
Sarajevo from where they shelled Serb positions, thus making the city a
"legitimate target". 

Since its founding in 1993, the ICTY has indicted 161 individuals, mostly
Serbs..

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to