http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=263706&area=/breaking_news/br
eaking_news__international_news/#
Extremist groups may be fanning cartoon anger
Lara Sukhtian | Dubai, United Arab Emirates
08 February 2006 06:29
The foreign minister of one Muslim country, Indonesia, says radical groups
are exploiting genuine public anger over the prophet Muhammad cartoons for
their own ends. A United States military spokesperson also says extremist
groups may be inciting the protests.
As anger and controversy over the caricatures continues, there are growing
questions whether countries like Syria and extremist groups like the Taliban
are fanning the outrage.
Few doubt there is genuine anger throughout the Muslim world. For religious
and secular Muslims alike, the images of the revered prophet Muhammad with a
bomb strapped to his head are crude, racist and deeply insulting.
"It was a message that all his [Muhammad's] followers are terrorists," said
Diaa Rashwan, an expert on Islamic and militant groups. In a world after the
September 11 attacks, when Muslims already feel they bear the brunt of the
war on terror, the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and new pressure on
Iran and Syria, Muslims feel more threatened than ever, Rashwan said on
Wednesday.
"That only further fuelled the anger this time around," he said. In essence,
the cartoons may have simply pushed an already edgy Muslim world into a
frenzy, releasing bottled-up anger and frustration.
Others think the violent crowds in some countries had encouragement.
In Afghanistan, where two days of riots left more than 10 dead, US military
spokesperson Colonel James Yonts said the US and other countries are
examining whether extremist groups incited riots.
"Other countries are having the same demonstrations, same problems -- very
violent demonstrations, starting peaceful, turning violent," Yonts said when
asked if al-Qaeda and the Taliban may have been involved.
He said the US and other countries will look to see "if this is something
larger than just a small demonstration -- if there is a tie to it, if there
is an infrastructure, a connection to it".
Zahor Afghan, the editor of Erada, Afghanistan's most respected newspaper,
said he felt there was definite incitement.
"No media in Afghanistan has published or broadcast pictures of these
cartoons. The radio has been reporting on it, but there are definitely
people using this to incite violence against the presence of foreigners in
Afghanistan," he said.
In Indonesia, that country's foreign minister said he also believes radical
groups around the world have jumped on the issue.
"The cartoons have hurt the Islamic community, so it has added to ammunition
for [global] radical groups to exploit the situation," Hassan Wirajuda said.
In Lebanon, protests against the Danish embassy turned into the stoning of a
nearby Christian church. Anti-Syrian groups have accused Damascus of sending
in violent rioters to destabilise the country and reignite a Lebanese civil
war.
Analysts say Syria -- under intense pressure over the slaying of Lebanese
leader Rafik Hariri and US accusations of harbouring terrorists -- is
sending a message that it can, and will, cause trouble if pushed too hard.
"They're [Syria] basically telling the West that we have a lot of potential
for rage and anger and here is a sample of it, so stay away from us," said
prominent Egyptian-American democracy advocate Saadiddine Ibrahim.
As in Syria, several hundred protesters burned and ransacked the Danish and
Austrian embassies in Iran's capital, Tehran. In a country where the
government has absolute control, few believe the protesters could have
pulled off such a brazen act without tacit government consent.
"It's clear these reactions were supported by some political elements. Even
state media alluded to the fact that European governments intentionally
ordered the production of cartoons," said Iranian political sociologist
Hamid Reza Jalaipour.
He thinks the violent protests were payback for the United Nations nuclear
watchdog referring Iran to the UN Security Council over its nuclear
programme.
The cartoons were first published on September 30 in a Danish Daily, the
Jyllands-Posten. Several days later, a coalition of Muslims in Denmark
demanded a meeting with the country's culture ministry to protest the
drawings, but the ministry refused.
The Muslim coalition turned to foreign embassies, and then went on a tour of
the Muslim and Arab world, calling attention to the cartoons. On a tour of
several Mideast countries between December and January, the group showed the
drawings that had been published by the Jyllands-Posten, but they also
compiled a document showing other cartoons of the prophet Muhammad, some
even more offensive than those the newspaper had published.
The tour prompted governments in the Mideast, including Saudi Arabia, to
order boycotts of Danish goods. Soon after, newspapers around the world
began republishing the drawings and the issue was brought back into the
spotlight.
Newspapers have argued that publishing the cartoons is a matter of free
speech, but many Muslims find that argument hard to believe. One 40-year-old
Afghani farmer, Sher Mohammed, said Americans and Europeans "are trying to
impose their culture on us by abusing our religion".
Even further angering Muslims is what they view as an apparent double
standard the West holds on free speech. In 2004, France's media watchdog,
the CSA, forced a Lebanese TV network to pull a programme off the airwaves
because Jewish groups had complained it was anti-Semitic.
Repeated calls for restraint from all sides, including the European
Parliament and Arab and Muslim governments, have so far fallen on deaf ears.
"There are people on both sides that want to ignite this flame," said
Reshwan. -- Sapa-AP
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
