http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=48548

 

Gun Enthusiasts Get Ugly in California Legislative

Push, Lock State 

Agents Out of Training Facility

 

6/8/2005 2:00:00 PM

 

To: National Desk

 

Contact: Amanda Wilcox of the Million Mom March,

530-432-2171, Peter 

Hamm of the Brady Campaign, 202-898-0792

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif., June 8 /U.S. Newswire/ -- A

shooting range here 

has announced a ban on use of its shooting facilities

by employees of 

the California Department of Justice because the

Department is 

supporting two bills in the State legislature that the

club opposes.

 

The bills represent groundbreaking new ballistic

identification 

systems which would give police new crime solving

tools. Each would 

set up systems for markings on gun ammunition in

California that 

would help law enforcement investigators track down

the perpetrators 

of shootings that might otherwise remain unsolved. One

bill (AB 352) 

would require handguns to include a device that stamps

a specific 

number on bullets that are fired by that handgun,

while the other (SB 

357) would require that ammunition manufacturers mark

ammunition with 

a serial number for potential tracking.

 

The bills have the support of the California DOJ. No

California law 

enforcement organizations oppose the measures. In a

letter to 

California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, Thomas S.

Hause, President 

of the Folsom Shooting Club, which operates the

Sacramento Valley 

Shooting Center outside Sacramento, wrote "The Board

of Directors of 

the Folsom Shooting Club (FSC) has directed me to

advise you, in 

writing, that Department of Justice staff, while

acting in their 

official capacity, are suspended from using the

Sacramento Valley 

Shooting Center (SVSC). The FSC is concerned that your

staff will 

further your efforts regarding AB 352 and SB 357 while

using our 

facility."

 

Leaders of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence

and the Million 

Mom March are urging the club to drop the policy

immediately. "It is 

offensive that the owners of this shooting range would

rather side 

with criminals than with law enforcement and victims,

not to mention 

that they are discriminating against people simply

because they have 

a different view on legislation," said Amanda Wilcox,

State Council 

Leader of the Million Mom March. "It is also very

troubling when it 

is law enforcement agents who are using the facility

for training 

purposes."

 

"What's next - should police who support sensible gun

laws have their 

firearms taken away? This is un-American, and these

guys ought to 

have their heads examined," said Jim Brady, chair of

the Brady 

Campaign.

 

The move has generated a great deal of activity on

internet chat 

sites. On one site, a person who self-identifies as a

member of the 

Folsom club wrote "Our range relies on law enforcement

agencies, 

mainly the California Dept of Corrections, for a large

part of our 

revenue. So this is no small thing to do."

 

Another chat posting read "Every gun store, gun

manufacturer, 

equipment supplier, and range should boycott all law

enforcement 

sales and support." Another read "If more companies

would make this 

stand and simply say 'if you're going to make it hard

for the public 

to own firearms then we aren't going to assist you in

arming yourself 

against them' maybe the balance would shift." Yet

another read "We 

should ask our respective gun clubs to ban all law

enforcement (not 

just the CA DOJ) from using their ranges as a training

ground or for 

their pistol qualifications. We'll see how far that

goes." (See the 

letter and the comments at 

http://calguns.net/eve/ubb.x/a/tpc/f/545600176/m/29010985521)

 

The state Assembly has passed AB 352, which would give

police the 

ability to match bullet shells at the scene of a crime

to the gun 

that fired the bullet. A day later, the State Senate

passed SB 357, 

the bill that will require that all handgun bullets

have a serial 

number that identifies the purchaser. These "cutting

edge" proposals 

are important, powerful tools for police and other

states may follow 

suit. AB 352 now moves to the State Senate and SB 357

now moves to 

the Assembly.

 

In 2003, there were nearly 1,600 handgun homicides in

California. In 

a typical year in California, no arrest is made in

almost half of the 

state's homicides because police lack enough evidence

to find the 

murderer.

 

 

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to