http://tinyurl.com/3b7lqql
How Sharia Undermines Western Justice <http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011090414425/us/islam-in-america/how-sharia-u ndermines-western-justice.html> Sunday, 04 September 2011 06:53 Andrew Bostom <http://www.rightsidenews.com/component/option,com_mailto/link,4ad4004082f8e c8bc9b0bb9fd9c8499740f7eb65/tmpl,component/> E-mail <http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011090414425/us/islam-in-america/how-sharia-u ndermines-western-justice/print.html> Print <http://www.rightsidenews.com/pdf/2011090414425/us/islam-in-america/how-shar ia-undermines-western-justice.pdf> PDF Wife-battering imam of the Darul Quran Mosque in Munich, Sheikh Abu Adam, is the face of Germany <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783361,00.html> s Islamic Justice. Adam gave a lecture at the citys Catholic University entitled An Islam which distances itself from violence, shortly before being arrested (12/10) for allegedly assaulting his spouse so violently that she suffered a broken nose and shoulder and numerous cuts and bruises. Media reports <http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011090414425/us/islam-in-america/how-sharia-u ndermines-western-justice.html#ixzz1Wto5pB8v> claimed the woman, who has borne one of his ten children, wanted to live a more western lifestyle, and was allegedly attacked by him after expressing this wish to her husband. The icon of Germanys Islamic parallel Islamic justice system, Sheikh Adam, purportedly shouted Koran 4:34 <http://www.quranbrowser.com/cgi/bin/get.cgi?version=shakir+arberry&layout=a uto&searchstring=004:034> at his wife as he beat her. » Abu-Adam [for eg., Shakir translation: Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great] Yale Assistant Professor of religious studies Eliyahu Sterns 9/2/11 NY Times op-ed <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/03/opinion/dont-fear-islamic-law-in-america. html?_r=1&ref=global> (Dont Fear Islamic Law in America) vilifies those who seek fair, rational legislative remedies to the encroachment of Islamic law (Sharia) in America as, stigmatizing Islamic life. Sterns vitriol is directed specifically at SB 1028 <http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/billinfo/BillSummaryArchive.aspx?BillNumber =SB1028&ga=107> , a bill which was recently passed by the Tennessee General Assembly, and includes this straightforward language regarding Sharia <http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/see-no-sharia/> : This bill defines sharia as the set of rules, precepts, instructions, or edicts which are said to emanate directly or indirectly from the god of Allah or the prophet Mohammed and which include directly or indirectly the encouragement of any person to support the abrogation, destruction, or violation of the United States or Tennessee Constitutions, or the destruction of the national existence of the United States or the sovereignty of this state, and which includes among other methods to achieve these ends, the likely use of imminent violence. Under this bill, any rule, precept, instruction, or edict arising directly from the extant rulings of any of the authoritative schools of Islamic jurisprudence of Hanafi, Maliki, Shafii, Hanbali, Jaafariya, or Salafi, as those terms are used by sharia adherents, is prima facie sharia without any further evidentiary showing. Michael Nazir Ali. was the first Bishop of Raiwand in Pakistans West Punjab (1984-1986), who emigrated to became the initial non-white diocesan bishop in the Church of England. During September 2009, he gave up his English Bishopric to work full-time in defense of beleaguered Christian minorities, particularly within Islamdom. Nazir Ali has authored Islam: A Christian Perspective (1984), Frontiers in Muslim-Christian Encopunters (2006), and >From Everywhere To Everywhere (2009). Contra Stern <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/03/opinion/dont-fear-islamic-law-in-america. html?_r=1&ref=global> s distressingly uninformed polemics, Nazir Ali offered these scholarly and experience-based observations <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8686504/Sharia-a-law-u nto-itself.html> from his adopted Britain (8/7/11), which support Tennessees eminently reasonable legislative solution. To understand the impact of Sharia law you have to look at other [i.e., Islamic] countries. At its heart it has basic inequalities between Muslims and non-Muslims, and between men and women. The problem with Sharia law being used in tribunals [in Britain] is that it compromises the tradition of equality for all under the law. It threatens the fundamental values that underpin our society. Author and veteran television journalist Joachim Wagner has just published his analysis of the parallel Sharia-based Islamic legal system burgeoning in Germany, entitled Richter ohne Gesetz <http://www.amazon.de/Richter-ohne-Gesetz-Paralleljustiz-Rechtsstaat/dp/3430 201276/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1315065979&sr=1-1> (Judges without Laws <http://www.amazon.de/Richter-ohne-Gesetz-Paralleljustiz-Rechtsstaat/dp/3430 201276/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1315065979&sr=1-1> ). Consistent with Nazir Alis assessment of the deleterious impact of Britains Muslim tribunals, Wagners alarming investigation summarized in English during a two <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783843,00.html> -part <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783361,00.html> Der Spiegel serieselucidates how what he terms Islamic shadow justice undermines Germanys Western constitutional legal system, ultimately abrogating even German criminal law. The parallel, indeed superseding application of Sharia within Germanys Muslim community is a widespread, dangerous phenomenon according to Wagner <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783843,00.html> s research. As far as I know, very prevalent. There are no reliable statistics, since these mediations take place almost exclusively in secret. But criminal investigators who specialize in organized crime and violence within Muslim immigrant families have confirmed for me that in nearly every conflict in this milieu, the first attempt is to find a solution outside the German justice system. These arbitrators try to resolve conflicts according to Islamic law and to sideline German criminal law. We see witness testimony withdrawn (from German courts) and accusations trivialized to the point where an entire case runs aground. The justice system is powerless, partly because it hasnt tackled the problem vigorously enough. Sheikh Abu Adam, wife-battering <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1335024/Muslim-imam-Sheikh-Adam-lec tures-non-violence-arrested-wife-beating.html> , polygamist <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783361,00.html> imam of the Darul Quran Mosque in Munich, illustrates the tragic, dangerous perversity of Germanys tacit acceptance of Sharia as a communal alternative legal system. A Munich-based arbitrator, Sheik Adam maintains that it is a religious duty to mediate among the Muslim faithful. The imam, who lives with three women, and in accord with classical Islamic understanding <http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/see-no-sharia/> , believes Islam is an all-encompassing theo-political ideology, described to Der Spiegel <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783361,00.html> how he applies his Sharia-based legal method. He invites both parties to visit him at the mosque, listens to both sides, and ultimately has them sign a peace treaty. The important thing, he says, is not whos right and wrong, and evidence is no particular helpthe important thing is to find a compromise. In nine out of 10 cases, the people respect his decision, he says. Adam added unabashedly <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783361,00.html> , despite ignoring accusations of running a shadow justice system, My judgment is fairer than the governments. I tell my people, dont go to the police. Well take care of this conflict among ourselves. Im making less work for the police. Sheikh Adam gave a lecture at Munichs Catholic University entitled An Islam which distances itself from violence, shortly before being arrested (12/10) for allegedly assaulting his spouse so violently that she suffered a broken nose and shoulder and numerous cuts and bruises. Media reports <http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011090414425/us/islam-in-america/how-sharia-u ndermines-western-justice.html#ixzz1Wto5pB8v> claimed the woman, who has borne one of his ten children, wanted to live a more western lifestyle, and was allegedly attacked by him after expressing this wish to her husband. An icon of Germanys Islamic parallel Islamic justice system, Sheikh Adam, purportedly shouted Koran 4:34 <http://www.quranbrowser.com/cgi/bin/get.cgi?version=shakir+arberry&layout=a uto&searchstring=004:034> at his wife as he beat her. [for eg., Shakir translation: Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great] Sheik Adams abusive (if Koran-sanctioned) misogyny (and polygamy; see Koran 4:3 <http://www.quranbrowser.com/cgi/bin/get.cgi?version=pickthall+yusufali+khan +shakir+sherali+khalifa+arberry+palmer+rodwell+sale+transliterated&layout=au to&searchstring=004:003> ), notwithstanding, there is no debating that his defiant rejection of Western evidentiary methods for establishing legal truth (and right versus wrong) reflects mainstream, Sharia-based jurisprudence. Joseph Schacht (d. 1969), arguably the pre-eminent 20th century Western scholar of Islamic law, made these salient observations about evidence and legal proof according to the Sharia, in his classic An Introduction to Islamic Law <http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Islamic-Law-Clarendon-Paperbacks/dp/0198 254733/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1315093579&sr=8-2> : The emphasis of the Islamic law of procedure lies not so much on arriving at the truth as on applying certain formal rules If both parties produce evidence, the number of the witnesses produced by each, beyond their minimum number, is irrelevant. There is no examination of the witnesses, or the likelihood of their testimony being true [I]n cases concerning hadd punishments (i.e., defined by the Muslim prophet Muhammad either in the Koran, or the hadith included <http://answering-islam.org/Books/Hughes/h.htm> : (lethal) stoning for adultery; death for apostasy; death for highway robbery, when accompanied by murder of the robbery victim; for simple highway robbery, the loss of hands and feet; for simple theft, cutting off of the right hand; for fornication, a hundred lashes; for drinking wine, eighty lashes) the evidence of women is not admitted, and in the case of zina (fornication) four male witnesses are required (notably. if a woman claims to have been raped!) the dhimmi (non-Muslims vanquished by jihad, and living under Sharia jurisdiction) cannot be a witness, except in matters concerning other dhimmis Clearly, Sharia standards which do not even seek evidentiary legal truth, while sanctioning explicit, blatant legal discrimination against women and non-Muslims, are intellectually and morally inferior to the antithetical concepts which underpin Western law. The late Kirsten Heisig <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783843,00.html> , a juvenile court judge in Germany, underscored a year ago, the inevitable consequences of relegating legal decisions to Muslim arbitrators such as Sheikh Adam: The law is slipping out of our hands. Its moving to the streets, or into a parallel system where an imam or another representative of the Koran determines what must be done. Moreover, Joachim Wagners Judges without Laws <http://www.amazon.de/Richter-ohne-Gesetz-Paralleljustiz-Rechtsstaat/dp/3430 201276/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1315065979&sr=1-1> documents <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783843,00.html> judges and prosecutors recollections of threats toward public officials and systematic interference with witnesses. For example, Stephan Kuperion, a juvenile court judge in Berlin, noted We know were being given a performance, but the courts are powerless. And Federal public prosecutor Jörn Hauschild provided this ominous warning: It would be a terrible development if serious criminal offenses in these circles could no longer be resolved. The legal system would be reduced to collecting victims. Wagner himself made this astute diagnosis of the current predicament to Der Spiegel <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783843,00.html> , and proffered an uncompromising interim resolution: Theyre [German public prosecutors and judges] overwhelmed, because they dont know how to react. Theyre in the middle of a legal case, and suddenly theres no evidence. Eighty-seven percent of the cases I researched either were dismissed or ended with an acquittal when Islamic arbitrators were involved. Prosecutors need to investigate Islamic arbitrators more intensively. If they had done so sooner, the arbitrators would have been convicted of obstruction of justice long ago. And certain lawyers need to stop behaving as if they were mere servants to a parallel justice system. They allow themselves to be directed by their clients desires, regardless of truth and justice. And finally, my plea would be for judges to hear witnesses earlier, which would reduce the arbitrators influence. But Wagner is keenly aware <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783843,00.html> of the more profound, fundamental incompatibility of Western law, and Sharia, the latter being, Very foreign, and for a German lawyer, completely incomprehensible at first. It follows its own rules. The Islamic arbitrators arent interested in evidence when they deliver a judgment, and unlike in German criminal law, the question of who is at fault doesnt play much of a role. Nearly six decades earlier, Robert H. Jackson, an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court (19411954), who also served as the chief United States prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, made these more expansive, complementary observations in his foreword <http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/647476987> to a treatise on Islamic law: In any broad sense, Islamic Law offers the American lawyer a study in dramatic contrasts. Even casual acquaintance and superficial knowledgeall that most of us at bench or bar will be able to acquirereveal that its striking features relative to our law are not likenesses but inconsistencies, not similarities but contrarieties. In its source, its scope and its sanctions, the law [i.e., Islamic Law, Sharia] of the Middle East is the antithesis of Western Law Islamic law, on the contrary, finds its chief source in the will of Allah as revealed to the Prophet Muhammad. It contemplates one community of the faithful, though they may be of various tribes and in widely separated locations. Religion, not nationalism or geography, is the proper cohesive force. The state itself is subordinate to the Quran, which leaves little room for additional legislation, none for criticism or dissent. This world is viewed as but the vestibule to another and a better one for the faithful, and the Quran lays down rules of behavior towards others and toward society to assure a safe transition. It is not possible to separate political or juristic theories from the teachings of the Prophet, which establish rules of conduct concerning religious, domestic, social, and political life. This results in a law of duties, rather than rights Joachim Wagners modern study <http://www.amazon.de/Richter-ohne-Gesetz-Paralleljustiz-Rechtsstaat/dp/3430 201276/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1315065979&sr=1-1> has lead him to conclude <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783843,00.html> that even the ostensibly limited application of Sharia arbitration within Germanys Muslim community nullifies the states Western conception of legal justice. The problem starts when the arbitrators force the justice system out of the picture, especially in the case of criminal offenses. At that point they undermine the state Islamic conflict resolution in particular, as Ive experienced it, is often achieved through violence and threats. Its often a dictate of power on the part of the stronger family. Past as prologue to the present, application of the Sharia has obviously negative societal repercussions, for both Muslims and non-Muslims. How this undeniable truth somehow escapes the mental and moral calculus of Western Sharia-apologists such as Yale <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/03/opinion/dont-fear-islamic-law-in-america. html?_r=3&ref=global> s Eliyahu Stern is astonishing, and reveals the frightening, delusively self-righteous cultural relativist mindset of the American academy. If Stern was truly desirous of protecting the unique Western freedoms many Muslim immigrants to the US cherish in common with non-Muslim Americans, he would applaud the Tennessee state legislatures bill SB 1028 <http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/billinfo/BillSummaryArchive.aspx?BillNumber =SB1028&ga=107> , instead of condemning it. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor biso...@intellnet.org http://www.intellnet.org Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
