http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100091346/another-slap-in-the
-face-for-britain-the-obama-administration-sides-with-argentina-and-venezuel
a-in-oas-declaration-on-the-falklands/

 


Another slap in the face for Britain: the Obama administration sides with
Argentina and Venezuela in OAS declaration on the Falklands 


By Nile Gardiner <http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/nilegardiner/>
World <http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/category/world/>  Last updated:
June 8th, 2011

677 Comments
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100091346/another-slap-in-th
e-face-for-britain-the-obama-administration-sides-with-argentina-and-venezue
la-in-oas-declaration-on-the-falklands/#disqus_thread>  Comment on this
article
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100091346/another-slap-in-th
e-face-for-britain-the-obama-administration-sides-with-argentina-and-venezue
la-in-oas-declaration-on-the-falklands/#dPostComment>  

President Obama was effusive in his praise
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100089556/president-obama-mu
st-now-deliver-on-the-special-relationship/> for the Special Relationship
when he visited London recently, but his administration continues to slap
Britain in the face over the highly sensitive Falklands issue. Washington
signed on to a  <http://www.oas.org/en/41ga/docs/AG05445E02.doc> "draft
declaration on the question of the Malvinas Islands" passed by unanimous
consent by the General Assembly of the Organisation of American States (OAS)
at its meeting in San Salvador yesterday, an issue which had been heavily
pushed by Argentina. In doing so, the United States sided not only with
Buenos Aires, but also with a number of anti-American regimes including Hugo
Chavez's Venezuela and Daniel Ortega's Nicaragua.

The declaration calls for Argentina and Great Britain to enter into
negotiations over the sovereignty of the Falklands, a position which London
has long viewed as completely unacceptable. It also comes in the wake of
increasing aggression by the Kirchner regime in the past 18 months,
including threats to blockade British shipping in the South Atlantic.

The OAS declaration <http://www.oas.org/en/41ga/docs/AG05445E02.doc> ,
adopted at the fourth plenary session on June 7, states:

It has not yet been possible to resume the negotiations between the two
countries with a view to solving the sovereignty dispute over the Malvinas
Islands, South Georgias and South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding
maritime areas in the framework of resolutions 2065 (XX), 3160 (XXVIII),
31/49, 37/9, 38/12, 39/6, 40/21, 41/40, 42/19 and 43/25 of the United
Nations General Assembly, the decisions adopted by the same body on the same
question in the Special Committee on Decolonization, and the reiterated
resolutions and declarations adopted at this General Assembly; and

HAVING HEARD the presentation by the head of delegation of the Argentine
Republic,

WELCOMES the reaffirmation of the will of the Argentine Government to
continue exploring all possible avenues towards a peaceful settlement of the
dispute and its constructive approach towards the inhabitants of the
Malvinas Islands.

REAFFIRMS the need for the Governments of the Argentine Republic and the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to resume, as soon as
possible, negotiations on the sovereignty dispute, in order to find a
peaceful solution to this protracted controversy.

DECIDES to continue to examine the Question of the Malvinas Islands at its
subsequent sessions until a definitive settlement has been reached thereon.

Washington backed a similar resolution
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100043042/hillary-clinton-sl
aps-britain-in-the-face-again-over-the-falklands/>  in June last year, and
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made it clear in a joint press conference
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100028048/hillary-clinton-sl
aps-britain-in-the-face-over-the-falklands/> with Cristina Kirchner in
Buenos Aires in March 2010 that the Obama administration fully backs
Argentina's calls for negotiations over the Falkands, handing her Argentine
counterpart a significant propaganda coup. The State Department has also
insultingly referred to the Islands in the past as the Malvinas
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100029327/the-obama-administ
ration%E2%80%99s-falklands-folly-is-a-diplomatic-disaster-for-washington/> ,
the Argentine name for them.

It is hugely disappointing that the Obama administration has chosen once
again to side not only with the increasingly authoritarian regime in
Argentina, but also with an array of despots in Latin America against
British interests. Mrs Clinton should be reminded that 255 brave British
servicemen laid down their lives in 1982 for the freedom of the Falkland
Islanders, who are overwhelmingly British, following the brutal Argentine
invasion.

The sovereignty of the Islands is not a matter for negotiation, and Britain
will never give in to threats from Argentina or its tyrannical allies in
places such as Venezuela. The White House recently declared that Britain
remains America's most important ally. Now it should live up to its words by
supporting Washington's closest friend and partner on matters of vital
British interest, including the future of British subjects living in the
South Atlantic, whose only wish is to remain free under the protection of
the Union Jack.

As Margaret Thatcher famously reminded the world, in an address to the House
of Commons  <http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/104910> after the
Argentine invasion in April 1982, the Falklands are, and always will remain
British:

The people of the Falkland Islands, like the people of the United Kingdom,
are an island race. Their way of life is British; their allegiance is to the
Crown. They are few in number, but they have the right to live in peace, to
choose their own way of life and to determine their own allegiance. It is
the wish of the British people and the duty of Her Majesty's Government to
do everything that we can to uphold that right. That will be our hope and
our Endeavour and, I believe, the resolve of every Member of the House.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to