http://calsun.canoe.ca/News/Columnists/Jackson_Paul/2006/06/04/1613598.html
   
  Only one way to go  Tenacity trumps capitulation in fight for world
democracy  By Paul Jackson

  DENVER -- Fabulously rich speechmaker Bill Clinton was uttering some
balderdash last week as to how global warming is a bigger threat to humanity
than world terrorism. 
  The man who does passable imitations of Elvis Presley did say global
warming is a more "remote" threat than world terrorism, but suggested we
should see it for what it is. 
  Well, just wait until some radical Islamic movement gets its hands on
nuclear weapons -- only a matter of time, unless we get really tough -- and
after New York, Washington or San Francisco is turned into radioactive
rubble we'll see which really is the biggest threat. 
  Global warming in those cities will not then be quite so remote. 
  No one will care about the pseudo-science aspect of climatic global
warming then. 
  But Bill, one of the great womanizers of all time -- has never really been
up on world terrorism. 
  From the first Islamic attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 to the
assault on the USS Cole and a half-dozen assaults on U.S. bases or embassies
in between by Islamic radicals, Clinton just went breezily along. 
  He had other things on his mind. 
  And you can guess what those were. 
  And so, when 9/11 came along, the U.S. was almost totally unprepared for
the attacks. 
  The Democrats, naturally, tried to lay the blame for 9/11 on President
George W. Bush -- charging he had been lackadaisical -- yet Bush had been in
office only a handful of months when 9/11 swept across our TV screens. 
  In actuality, Bush responded with alacrity to 9/11 and is still
unrelenting in his fight against world terrorism, which the man with the
loose zipper figures is an overblown scare compared to burning fossil fuels
to run our cars and keep our homes warm. 
  Let's just hope if Clinton's long-suffering wife Hillary wins the
Democratic presidential nomination, she doesn't actually win the presidency.

  If she did, Bill might be whispering calming words in her ear. Most of us
understand Bill is fond of whispering in women's ears. 
  Right now, though, suggest one achievement -- aside from frolicking with a
young tart name Monica Lewinsky-- of Clintons during his eight-year term. 
  Just one. 
  If you can, call collect. 
  For instance, just days ago, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was in
Washington pleading for support for his nation. His visit follows many
previous attempts by Israel during the Clinton administration to get the
U.S. to safeguard that country from terrorist attacks. 
  Yet despite all of Clinton's assurances the Israeli-Palestinian -- and
Arab -- conflict would be solved, there was no progress whatsoever under his
tenure. 
  A week before Clinton's assessment that we worry too much about terrorist
bombs exploding in London, Madrid and on the island of Bali or the cowardly
attacks in Iraq on innocent civilians, two men who do know what the world
situation is like were on stage together in Washington. 
  They were Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair. 
  For a half-hour, they spoke eloquently about world terrorism and the fight
to bring democracy to Iraq. 
  Both were calm, but precise. 
  These men, the targets of the Lib-Left media, and maligned by political
would-bes who are inferior in every way to Bush and Blair, have stuck it out
together while other wavering 'leaders' have slowly strayed away. 
  They are steadfast individuals who will not be cowed into capitulation. 
  Both know -- as do the Islamic terrorists and the sheiks of the Mideast
dictatorships -- that if democracy can be solidified in Iraq, there will be
a domino effect that will sweep the region. 
  Hundreds of millions of men, women and children now living under serfdom
in their oil rich dictatorships will rise up against their totalitarian
masters. 
  It will be like the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe all over again. 
  Blair made another assessment to which we should all pay immediate
attention: The United Nations needs "radical" reform. 
  Hardly an overstatement. 
  The UN is a corrupt outfit in several ways: Morally, financially and
structurally. 
  Morally, you have a bunch of African and Mideastern totalitarian states
holding sway over the western democracies. 
  That's part of the structural corruption, too. 
  Financially, as we have seen in any number of recent scandals, the "hands
in the pockets" by various officials make the scandals at Enron and Worldcom
and the like look like childish misdemeanors. 
  The UN is, Blair declared, as out of touch with the realities of today's
world as the British welfare state of the early 1940s would be with the
needs of 2006. 
  On so many issues, both Blair and Bush are perceptive. 
  As President Ronald Reagan, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Pope John
Paul are carved in history as heroes who brought freedom and democracy to
hundreds of millions, so will Bush and Blair. 
  There are two sides to choose from: Appeasement and capitulation to
Islamic terrorism -- and the sham of the UN -- which in the end will mean
the end of our civilization, or on the side of dedication and determination
to do the right thing, which will take courage and tenacity, but which is
the only way individuals with decency and vision can go. 
  





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Home is just a click away.  Make Yahoo! your home page now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to