Half-baked and ignorant of Islam, points 1, 2, 3, and 5 would work and are
necessary...point 4 is ridiculous and ignores the fact that Islam has been
at war with non-Muslims for 1500 years and 25 years ago launched its Third
Global Jihad.  Point 6 about involving women as allies against Islam (their
greatest enemy) is valid but not in the sense the author means.  There are
no Muslim "allies" against Islam.  This is a contradiction in terms.  All
non "true-believers" must be rallied against Islam, though.
 
Point 7 is useful in that propaganda by the West against Islam must be
better developed...but if the Arab/Farsi/Urdu speakers are Muslims, then one
is inviting traitors and Fifth Columnists into the heart of our governments.
 
-Bruce
 
 

Published on TaipeiTimes <http://www.taipeitimes.com>   
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2005/08/09/2003267049

Seven ways to stop the global spread of terror

Islamic militancy is not inevitable and solutions are possible. Merely
saying that the bombers are mad does not help

By Jason Burke
THE OBSERVER , LONDON 
Tuesday, Aug 09, 2005,Page 9 

It would be nice if there were a silver bullet. There isn't, of course, but
current Islamic militancy has its origins not in the Middle Ages or in
violence inherent in a major faith, but in real problems in the real world
-- so real solutions are possible.

One, we need to recognize that "al-Qaeda" is an ideology, not an
organization. There is no point in talking about masterminds or hunting for
a global headquarters. There are none.

Two, we need to stop confusing justification with explanation. Learning what
motivates enemies does not mean sympathizing with them.

Merely saying that the bombers are mad, when there is no evidence that
militants are mentally ill or backward, and when contemporary radical Islam
clearly has its roots in the conditions of the modern world, does not help.

Three, we should ditch the rhetoric. There is no point in saying, "We will
never surrender to terrorism," when history tells us that, in order to
manage a terrorist threat, successive governments in the UK and abroad
always mixed "hard" coercive measures, such as those announced by British
Prime Minister Tony Blair last week, with a "soft" political strategy that
undercuts the legitimacy of the militants' claims.

Representatives of the IRA are in the UK parliament. The Egyptians and
Algerians ended their mass Islamic insurgencies of the early 1990s with
judicious concessions as well as repression. The Americans blithely admitted
recently to talks with Iraqi insurgents.

Four, we need to recognize that doing things that enrage millions, even if
we feel that anger is wrong-headed and misdirected, will make us more of a
target. 

Before the invasion of Iraq the UK was fairly low down the target list for
the militants. Now, the UK has joined Israel and the US at its top. It is
impossible to speak with any credibility to young British Muslims -- or any
young Muslims -- without admitting this.

Five, the July 7 bombers were not "brainwashed" by anyone. Radical Islam
provided them with an explanation of what was happening in the world and
suggested actions that made sense to them. 

So we need a broad range of measures to ensure that such ideologies are less
likely to convince in the future. If we cannot negotiate with existing
militants, we can at least stop the next wave of recruits.

Some causes of terrorism do exist within the UK. They include identity
issues and the poor economic performance of many British Muslim communities
as much as the activities of radical rabble-rousers from overseas. We need
to accept that a harsher security environment will temporarily be necessary.
Another major bombing in the UK could damage community relations beyond
repair. We now know quite what a powerful weapon surveillance cameras are,
whatever their civil liberties implications. 

Legal loopholes that mean men such as Abu Qatada, a key radical ideologue,
cannot be expelled or detained should be closed. 

Most Islamic countries have a system of government-run colleges for Muslim
clerics and licensing for such scholars and the UK needs one too to make
sure that the lessons taught in mosques, religious schools and prisons are
moderate.

But the real causes are international -- and can be dealt with through real
policies. Militants often cite Chechnya, Kashmir and Palestine as examples
of Western oppression of Muslims. In each case, complex historical,
political and economic factors have combined to sustain conflict. But with
sufficient will and attention, and a balanced, tough-minded approach,
solutions are possible. Merely making an obvious effort to solve problems in
a fair-minded way would be extremely helpful in restoring the goodwill many
in the Islamic world once felt towards Britain.

Six, we need to look for new allies in the Islamic world. We should be
developing major programs to develop civic society, with a particular
emphasis on involving women, beyond the state. 

There are thousands of under-resourced groups involved in everything from
literacy to human rights to micro-credit that can be assisted, with or
without the consent of local governments, from the Maghreb to the Far East.
They can help us to show the Islamic world that our way of life does not
mean: "neo-imperialism" or "moral corruption" but is about tolerance,
justice and empowerment of the weak. They will help form a critical
pro-Western, moderate and locally authentic bloc that in time will become a
strong and important voice.

Seven, if the above seems intimidating, we must remember that small steps
can make a huge difference. For instance, we need to sell ourselves better.
The UK Foreign Office needs hundreds of Arabic and Urdu speakers to project
our message. 

The Blair government is determined to improve community relations in the UK,
but needs to think globally. Every diplomatic mission should make convincing
Muslims that the West is not an aggressor a priority.

None of these measures will end the threat of terrorism, but central to our
efforts must remain a simple fact: Violent Islamic militancy is not
inevitable. 

Copyright C 1999-2005 The Taipei Times. All rights reserved. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hv29920/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123609858/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to