Oh. I get it. We've pissed 'em off. Now we're *really* gonna get it.

Riiiight.

Cheers,
RAH
--------

<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/13/opinion/13friedman.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print&position=>

The New York Times

April 13, 2005
OP-ED COLUMNIST

The Calm Before the Storm?
 By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN


o here's a question that I've been wrestling with lately: With all these
reports about the bungling of U.S. intelligence, and the C.I.A.'s relying
on bogus informants with names like "Curveball" or "Knucklehead" or
whatever, why have there been no terrorist attacks in the U.S. since 9/11?
I've got my own pet theory about what's produced this period of calm - and,
more important, why it may be coming to an end.

Let's start with the facts. Despite all the code reds and code oranges
we've been subjected to by the Department of Homeland Security, and despite
the mountain of newspaper articles about how underprotected our ports and
borders are, the fact is that not only has there not been another 9/11, but
there has not even been a serious failed attempt that we know of.

 I'm not complaining - I'm just wondering why. It still seems to me
ridiculously easy to blow up a car in the heart of Chicago. And anyone who
has flown on a private jet since 9/11 can tell you that security at these
private terminals is still so lax that if you showed up in a Saudi
headdress with a West Virginia driver's license under the name of "Billy
Bob bin Laden" and asked for flight directions for your chartered Learjet
to Lower Manhattan, there's a good chance no one would stop you.

 So, how then do we explain the calm? To begin with, I'd give a tip o' the
hat to the C.I.A., the F.B.I. and the Department of Homeland Security. I
have no doubt that their increased vigilance - and coordination with
European and Arab intelligence services - has made it much harder for
terrorists to organize. Moreover, thanks to Gen. John Abizaid's Centcom
forces in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda no longer has a whole country from which to
plan, train and coordinate terrorist attacks with impunity. The fact that
Al Qaeda effectively controlled a country is what made it unique. Also, new
U.S. visa policies have made it much harder for bad guys to get into
America.

 If your name is Muhammad and you are a 21-year-old single Arab man and you
have not visited Disney World yet, well, you may want to consider Euro
Disney, because your chances of getting a U.S. tourist visa are very low.
Frankly, I wish this were not the case because we're keeping a lot of good,
talented Arab men and women from getting educated in America, which is the
best way of building friends. This is one of the sad byproducts of 9/11 -
but it has undoubtedly made it more difficult for the few bad apples to get
in as well.

Despite all of that, I fear that we may now be entering the most dangerous
period since 9/11. Why? Because I've always believed that one of the most
important reasons there has been no new terrorist attack in America has to
do with the U.S. invasions of both Iraq and Afghanistan. It is not only
that the Bush administration has taken the fight to the enemy, but that the
enemy has welcomed that fight.

 To the extent that the Baathists and Jihadists have a coordinated
strategy, their first priority, I think, is to defeat American forces in
the heart of their world. Because if they can defeat America in the heart
of the Arab-Muslim world, it will have so much more resonance than setting
off a car bomb in Las Vegas - especially now that 9/11 has set the
terrorism bar so high in terms of effect.

 If the Jihadists can defeat us in the heart of their world, and force us
from Iraq, it will have a huge impact on the Arab street and shake every
pro-American Arab regime. The Jihadists have always understood that Iraq is
the ballgame. Iraq is the big one. Winning there is what really advances
their agendas.

The reason things may be getting more dangerous now is that the formation
of a freely elected government in Iraq may signal that the
Baathist-Jihadist insurgency is being gradually defeated. The U.S. may even
be able to withdraw some troops. And there is nothing worse for the
Baathists and Jihadists than to be defeated in the heart of their world -
and, even more so, to be defeated in the heart of their world by other
Arabs and Muslims who are repudiating the Jihadists' vision and tactics.

 I fear that when and if the Jihadists conclude that they have been
defeated in the heart of their world, they will be sorely tempted to throw
a Hail Mary pass. That is, they may want to launch a spectacular,
headline-grabbing act of terrorism in America that tries to mask, and
compensate for, just how defeated they have become at home.

In short, the more the Jihadists lose in Iraq, the more likely they are to
use their rump forces to try something really crazy in America to make up
for it. So let's stay the course in Iraq, but stay extra-vigilant at home.

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to