"The Declaration of Independence upended that age-old notion of rights. All
men -- not just Americans -- have been endowed by God and nature, not
government, with fundamental and unalienable rights. Governments are called
into existence by the people -- and exist at their pleasure -- for one
purpose: to protect the exercise of these inherent rights." 

The Real Meaning of the Fourth of July
by  <http://www.fff.org/aboutUs/bios/jgh.asp> Jacob G. Hornberger, July 4,
2008

Contrary to popular myth, the men who signed the Declaration of Independence
were not great Americans. Instead, they were great Englishmen. In fact, they
were as much English citizens as Americans today are American citizens. It's
easy to forget that the revolutionaries in 1776 were people who took up arms
against their own government. 

So how is it that these men are considered patriots? Well, the truth is that
their government didn't consider them patriots at all. Their government
considered them to be bad guys -- traitors, all of whom deserved to be
hanged for treason. 

Most of us consider the signers of the Declaration of Independence to be
patriots because of their courage in taking a stand against the wrongdoing
and tyranny of their own government, even risking their lives in the
process. 

Yet not even the patriotism and courage of these English citizens
constitutes the foremost significance of the Fourth of July, any more than
the military victory over their government's forces at Yorktown does. 

Instead, the real significance of the Fourth of July lies in the expression
of what is undoubtedly the most revolutionary political declaration in
history: that man's rights are inherent, God-given, and natural and, thus,
do not come from government. 

Throughout history, people have believed that their rights come from
government. Such being the case, people haven't objected whenever government
officials infringed upon their rights. Since rights were considered to be
government-bestowed privileges, the thinking went, why shouldn't government
officials have the power to regulate or suspend such privileges at will? 

The Declaration of Independence upended that age-old notion of rights. All
men -- not just Americans -- have been endowed by God and nature, not
government, with fundamental and unalienable rights. Governments are called
into existence by the people -- and exist at their pleasure -- for one
purpose: to protect the exercise of these inherent rights. 

What happens if a government that people have established becomes a
destroyer, rather than a protector, of their rights? The Declaration
provides the answer: It is the right of the people to alter or even abolish
their government and establish new government whose purpose is the
protection, not the destruction, of people's rights and freedoms. 

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights must be construed in light of that
revolutionary statement of rights in the Declaration of Independence. The
American people used the Constitution to bring the federal government into
existence but also, simultaneously, they used that document to limit the
government's powers to those expressly enumerated in the Constitution. With
the Constitution, people limited the powers of their own government in a
formal, structured way, with the aim of protecting their rights and freedoms
from being infringed upon by that same government. 

Why did Americans deem it desirable and necessary to limit the powers of the
federal government? Because they feared the possibility that their new
government would become like their former government against which they had
had to take up arms. While they recognized the necessity for government --
as a means to protect their rights -- they also recognized that the federal
government was the greatest threat to their rights. By severely limiting the
powers of the federal government to those enumerated within the
Constitution, the Framers intended to encase the federal government within a
straitjacket. 

Even that was not sufficient for the American people, however. As a
condition for approving the Constitution, they demanded passage of the Bill
of Rights, which emphasized two deeply held beliefs: (1) that the federal
government, not some foreign entity, constitutes the greatest threat to the
rights and liberties of the American people; and (2) that the enumeration of
specific rights and liberties, both substantive and procedural, would better
ensure their protection from federal infringement. 

On the Fourth of July we celebrate the patriotism and courage of those
English revolutionaries who were willing to pledge their lives, fortunes,
and sacred honor in defense of the most revolutionary declaration of rights
in history -- that man's rights come from God and nature, not from
government. 

http://www.fff.org/comment/com0807b.asp 

-- 



 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to