http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/us-weighs-antiterror-missile-plan/2006/0
8/28/1156617274862.html
 
US weighs anti-terror missile plan
 
THE Pentagon is considering a plan to replace the nuclear warheads on some
intercontinental ballistic missiles with conventional weapons for
pre-emptive strikes against terrorists, according to US Defence Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld.
Mr Rumsfeld said taking the nuclear warhead off the missiles would make them
less lethal and therefore a more conceivable option for accurately and
quickly targeting terrorists groups that pose a lethal threat.
"We don't know how the world is going to evolve but we do know that there
are terrorist networks in the world and they are already using missiles. We
just saw what Hezbollah did, firing some 4000 missiles into Israel," Mr
Rumsfeld said after meeting Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov.
Mr Rumsfeld said he hoped Russia would consider the idea too, but Mr Ivanov
said there may be different solutions for pre-emptive strikes.
The US military will test its missile defence system this Thursday, the
fullest demonstration since a pair of tests grounded the program 18 months
ago.
Military officials sought to lower expectations, though.
Although a target missile will be fired from Kodiak Island, Alaska, and an
interceptor rocket topped with a "kill vehicle" will launch from
California's Vandenberg Air Force Base, both military and industry officials
say they are not actually trying to shoot down the missile.
"We are not going to try to hit the target," said Scott Fancher, head of
Boeing Corp's ground-based missile defence program. "It is not a primary or
secondary test objective to hit the target."
After a tour of the missile interceptor silos, Mr Rumsfeld said that
although he wanted to see a "full end-to-end test," he was patient - and
rejected suggestions that the system should try to hit the target this time.
Air Force Lieutenant-General Henry Obering, director of the Missile Defence
Agency, said that although it was not one of the goals of the test, it was
possible that the kill vehicle would take out the missile.
But he said the military was focused on making sure a redesigned kill
vehicle was able to spot the target missile, distinguish between its booster
stage and warhead, and communicate with the control centres on the ground.
"This is about as good as it gets in terms of a system test," General
Obering said.
The general said previously that he believed the missile defence system
could shoot down a long-range North Korean missile aimed at the United
States.
"We can protect LA, we can protect the entire United States, from both
California and Alaska, from a North Korea threat," he said.
Asked if he shared General Obering's confidence, Mr Rumsfeld said: "I . want
to see it happen."
The military is not going to try and knock out a target missile until
December, a test General Obering called the "final stage".
Critics have long raised doubts about the costly and ambitious system.
Although the interceptors have hit dummy missiles in five-out-of-10 tests,
some independents experts have suggested that the conditions were too
controlled and the targets not realistic enough.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to