"Woodward said the possibility of "the Mideast imploding," cannot be 
dismissed, and that his darkest fear, shared by some in the 
intelligence community, is that terrorists are waiting 
until "multiple, high-stakes attacks" can be launched on U.S. cities 
and targets. 
He said, "9-11 will be a footnote, but it could happen, and if it 
does, we will become a police state."


What better way for a massive terrorist attack on several major 
American cities than to be able to bring in and coordinate delivery 
of 40 foot cargo containers containing WMD, high explosives or 
attack squads to key target city locations.  Having a sympathetic or 
controllable port management company from UAE in charge of major 
U.S. ports and the cargo movement out of them is a wonderful gift 
for terrorists.  But, perhaps an imperial presidency that may have 
let 9/11 happen in the first place and DID PROMOTE the general who 
failed to shoot down any of the four terrorist-controlled planes to 
head the Northern Command responsible for Homeland Security, might 
not be too disappointed to be able to impose police state rules 
after a massive successful terrorist attack.  Motivations can be 
interesting...

David Bier

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA022206.01B.woodwar
d.129cfa8d.html

Woodward warns of secrecy trend 

Web Posted: 02/22/2006 12:00 AM CST
Tracy Idell Hamilton
Express-News Staff Writer 

The greatest threat to America's democracy is not terrorism but 
governmental secrecy, said Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Bob 
Woodward, whose reporting 35 years ago pierced the veil of secrecy 
behind Richard Nixon's presidency. 

Although a massive, coordinated attack on the country, making 9-11 
look like a "footnote," is still possible, the nation faces a 
greater threat from the federal government's current secrecy drive, 
Woodward told an audience in San Antonio on Tuesday. 

"Democracies die in darkness," Woodward told the 500-person crowd of 
mostly business and community leaders as part of Trinity 
University's policy maker breakfast series, a 25-year tradition. 

The Bush administration, which gave Woodward remarkable access for 
his two books on the administration's war on terror, "Bush At War," 
in 2002 and "Plan of Attack," in 2004, has cloaked its decision-
making in "an immense amount of secrecy," he said, "too much, in my 
view." 

The administration says it needs to work in secret because of the 
nature of the Iraqi war and the surprise tactics terrorists rely on. 



John Davenport/Express-News

Ann Knoebel, of Trinity University, chats with renowned journalist 
Bob Woodward. The reporter addressed a breakfast crowd Tuesday.
 
 
 

He also faulted a round-the-clock news cycle that emphasizes speed 
over accuracy and demands that journalists not just report but 
predict the future. 

Having a year to work on his latest book, about Bush's decision to 
launch the Iraqi war, he said, allowed him to gather an immense 
amount of information from a variety of sources. 

He then wrote a 21-page memo to the president, outlining what he had 
learned. 

Jokes aside about whether the president reads 21-page memos, 
Woodward said he was given 31/2 hours to interview the president. He 
called it the longest interview a sitting president has ever 
granted. 

The resulting book, "Plan of Attack," tries to offer "understanding 
and perspective, not to condemn, or endorse, but to explain" what 
happened during the 16 months he said it took Bush to decide to go 
to war. 

"And make no mistake, it was Bush's decision," he said, although he 
called Vice President Dick Cheney "a steam rolling force" in the 
process. 

At the beginning of his talk, Woodward asked for a show of hands 
from those who voted for Bush in 2004. 

Most in the crowd raised their hands. 

But fewer hands were raised when he asked if attendees believed in 
Bush's tax cuts, and whether they agreed with Bush's decision to 
launch a secret wiretap program to listen in an unknown number of 
domestic communications to overseas telephones without court-issued 
warrants. 

When he asked the crowd if it believed, with the benefit of 
hindsight, if going to war was "necessary and wise," fewer than half 
the room's hands went up. 

After noting that the results of the last question of his 
unscientific poll could spell trouble for the administration, he 
told the crowd that all the questions were really just tricks, to 
see how many "rich nosy warmongering Republicans" were in the room. 

"A lot, I see," he said, drawing laughs. "And very proud of it, I 
can see." 

But it is not just governments that keep secrets; Trinity declined 
to say how much it paid Woodward. 

A report by the Toronto Sun estimated his fee at between $20,000 and 
$30,000. 

By comparison, Tour de France cyclist Lance Armstrong, golfer Arnold 
Palmer and former President George Bush make about $100,000 per 
engagement. 

Woodward said the possibility of "the Mideast imploding," cannot be 
dismissed, and that his darkest fear, shared by some in the 
intelligence community, is that terrorists are waiting 
until "multiple, high-stakes attacks" can be launched on U.S. cities 
and targets. 

He said, "9-11 will be a footnote, but it could happen, and if it 
does, we will become a police state." 

Even as he scolded the media's tendency to prophesy the future, 
Woodward offered his prediction for the 2008 presidential race. 

By all indications, he said, Democrat Hillary Clinton is running. 

He noted that Republicans have a long track record of 
nominating "old war horses." 

Given that, and depending on how things in Iraq proceed, "You're 
going to think I'm crazy, but you heard it here first. I think they 
could nominate Dick Cheney." 







--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to