Interesting responses...
I have in fact only just stumbled upon Bohm's work and came to it quite
circuitously. Lately I've been reading a lot of books about physics --
The Dancing Wu Li Masters, Paul Davies's works, Fritjof Capra's stuff.
This was just out of interest, but like everything, I foun
Chris,
I was quite struck by your comment:
>It ends with me hypothesising that in consensus processes situated in
collectivist cultural settings, there is no distinction between the
>individual and the group.
My experience of OS is indeed that it allows both the indivual and the group
to be most
At 12:16 AM 12/24/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Interesting responses...
>
>I have in fact only just stumbled upon Bohm's work and came to it quite
>circuitously. Lately I've been reading a lot of books about physics --
>The Dancing Wu Li Masters, Paul Davies's works, Fritjof Capra's stuff.
>This was jus
All:
Peg wrote, among many other fine things:
"My experience of OS is indeed that it allows both the indivual and the group to
be most fully themselves...I want to poke a bit at this work being
about consensus. I think it moves into something much richer than consensus.
This may be subtle, b
