Re: Request for Advice - Contributing to an OS when you can't be there

2000-08-04 Thread Beverly McCarthy
Hello Meg, I'm empathetic to your desire to "make things work". I sometimes find myself trying to rekindle what has been valuable in the past, but slowly dying in the present. As I go through the agonizing stage of "what can I do to make this work", I remember the message from Meg Wheatley i

Contributing when you can't be there

2000-08-04 Thread Meg Salter
Thanks so much to everyone who responded for the helpful input. I'm very mindful of "whoever comes are the right people" and "when it's over, it's over". I guess maybe I was just trying too hard (story of my life!!). The motto, once again, is to let go! It is also so great to know that one is

tmn.com conversations

2000-08-04 Thread Larry Peterson
I tried to get into the Open Space Caucus at tmn.com recently, now that I have a bit more time for reflection. I had gone there once and thought I had registered under "new" to get into the conversation. When I tried to use the same sign in, it referred be to the "join" page. I didn't think I ha

is there a david armstrong in the e-house?

2000-08-04 Thread Michael Herman
this from the website... do we know this guy? is one of us him? ...and have you made yourself findable via the http://openspaceworld.org site? thanks for whatever help we can give here, michael Subject: Re: Practitioners Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:09:36 +01

Re: Help!

2000-08-04 Thread Chris Corrigan
Carol: I have done Open Space meetings with the following organizations which may be of interest to you: Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (BC Region) Department of Canadian Heritage (Urban Aboriginal Strategy (Vancouver) and Urban Multi-Purpose Aboriginal Youth Centres Progr

turd theory

2000-08-04 Thread Jeff Aitken
The other day I learned something about the difference between OSLIST in digest form (which some of us receive) and OSLIST one message at a time (which some of us receive.) At the risk of using elephant metaphors once again, it's called turd theory. If we receive one message at a time, we "reply"