Ah... right Harrison - I was forgetting how Kathy does it.
We just plunk the "max mix" in a room and let them fight it
out.. :) I guess I'm calling any "representative" group
that has been select as a cross section (vs selected by
having a passion for an issue) a max/mix.
Sometimes - and not alwa
Harrison wrote:
This is the Old curmuddgin speaking. And I know it is Christmas and
Hanukkah -- so I should be very charitable. Glowing with the season, as it
were. But every time I hear about Mix/Match it reminds me of Running Rats in
my college Experimental Psych Lab.
No idea what a curm
Hello Sharon,
Thank you very much for your detailed answer!
I am really appreciative of the time and effort you took for
"repairing" my ignorance.
We use something quite similar that I call "a steering comity" for large
group OS events. This is a group of people who want to take part and
I've been sitting with Kenoli's message, caught between the ease of going
back to business as usual and the drive to make a difference post 9-11.
Thanks for the question Kenoli; I find great power in the asking. I am
doing my best to stay with it because I have no easy answers.
Paul, your respons
In a message dated 23/12/2001 13:39:35 Eastern Standard Time,
pe...@opencirclecompany.com writes:
> I believe the great creator of real, deep, lasting solidarity comes EXACTLY
> from expressing viewpoints that disagree. If you and others, with
> different
> points of view weren't part of this mi
My responses are below, following the
**
Peggy
- Original Message -
From: Artur F. Silva
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Self-Organization (to Peggy)
Thank you
So what happens Peggy if one like you (who beleives in dialogue with
oponents) is dependent with his life on one like Paul (Who does not beleive
in dialogue between people who disagree) and you deeply disagree on many
levels?
You know from the OsOnOs that I am deeply involved in that question. I ju
In a message dated 12/23/01 1:36:24 PM, avn...@inter.net.il writes:
<< So what happens Peggy if one like you (who beleives in dialogue with
oponents) is dependent with his life on one like Paul (Who does not beleive
in dialogue between people who disagree) and you deeply disagree on many
levels