A practical question too:
I will be running an OST taster on Thursday for a group of about 30 - 40
people.
We have three hours in total. For various reasons, I need to leave 45
minutes for the intro, and 45 minute for the closing circle. This leaves me
1.5 hours for the small groups.
Dear friends,
I would like to share with you an invitation to an intergenerational
gathering that I am co-organizing and co-hosting with people from Pioneers
of Change, Art of Hosting and World Cafe networks. In our search and
exploration of creating whole and resilient communities and a life-af
Fun Stuff! I am on the road and away from my library -- which means I can't
check on what Stuart K. said nor what I said. But no mind, what I should have
said (even if I didn't) is that the first condition is a "relatively safe
neutrient environment." It must be neutrient or nothing will grow --
Hi Marty,
Interesting questions! The way I understand it,
Kaufman does not refer to an environment with
abundant food supply. Neither does he mean an
environment where the food supply is constant. I
have always taken it as referring to an
environment that provides at least a minimal
level o
you know marty... there are at least 4 types of people...
broken into 16 by the typologists. re: Myers Briggs Psychological Types
doesn't matter. either way you look at it, if you have a mix of people, a good
balance is good.
so stable nutrient environment? differences. complexity. di
Dear all:
I have a couple of philosophical questions about the concept of a "stable
nutrient environment." According to Stuart Kauffman, as quoted by Harrison,
this is Condition #1 for self-organization.
My questions:
a. What does this mean scientifically? Presumably Kauffman is talk
