At 17:19 21.3.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>For all who may be interested, please open the attached flyer, which
>includes ordering information and a couple of excerpts.
Please let me quote a message posted to the list Nov. 15, 2000:
Dear all,
may I draw your attention to a never ending story. The ti
... or just follow the instruction trailing *every* message published in this
group...
cu,
Christoph
At 10:16 21.3.2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Since this comes up from time to time, here are the instructions from Murli.
>
>Chris -- how about adding this to the FAQ?
>
>Peggy
>
>
>- Original Messa
At 16:37 1.2.2001 -0500, Harrison wrote:
((...))
For me, chaos and order are both abstractions and neither exist in a pure
sense. They are actually "pointers" to a polar (dialectical) framework
which might look something like the following: chaos< --- life
--->order. The suggestion is that lif
Hi Artur,
At 01:29 1.2.2001 +, you wrote:
At 01:41 01-02-2001 +0100, Christoph J.W. Schmees wrote:
In the first place there is no connection between choas theory (fractals,
Julia sets, bifurcation, you name it) and Prigogine's work
What do you mean by "there are no connect
At 23:58 31.1.2001 +, you wrote:
At 18:05 31-01-2001 -0500, Harrison Owen wrote:
I suspect this can be very important to other questions
we have discussed here, namely, that "normal organizations" are
"constrained systems", that are in a sort of "equilibrium". So they
DO NOT evidence the c
message forwarded:
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Beck_Gy=F6rgy?=
To:
Subject: agree
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:10:44 +0100
Dear Christoph,
I completely agree. Because of some reasons I could not have my mail below
published at the OSLIST.
In the most recent digest there has been repeated Chris Corrig
At 10:26 17.1.2001 +0600, Elena A. Marchuk wrote:
...
I'm sorry for the attachment, I discovered that I forgot to attach it first
and started to do this: I wanted to send 4 pictures and a small text. But
when I started sending I discovered that it would be more then 4 MB
so I stopped sendin
((Qoute omitted this time))
Chris,
by and by things we are discussing become clearer for me. Perhaps we come
from different backgrounds, with different experiences. I have spent my
time in industry large and stiff.
Can it be that the rules or laws of OST are not applicable to each end
every orga
Certainly positions in hierarchical structure each carry predefined
responsibilities. And I do not consider hierarchical structure to be
antithetical to an Open Space (or InterActive) Organization; I believe that
hierarchy and InterActivity (emergent leadership) can exist simultaneously.
Com
At 23:12 10.1.2001 +, you wrote:
> First - The system has to be far from equilibrium. You need an excess of
> energy, and a clear direction of energy flow. In social systems: You need a
> leader with a vision and the ability to transport the vision to his people.
> Call it CI, call it mission
At 08:19 10.1.2001 -0800, you wrote:
Christoph,
Your question:
What conditions are necessary to enable a productive chaos? What skills
does a leader need to create and maintain(!) those conditions? Where is the
right balance between control and let loose? Which factors determine this
balance?
Dear Esther and Dear all,
... Stuff happens and whatever
happens is the only thing that could!
(So you deny the free will, and hence any responsibility of man? :-)
... I would add another
which is that when someone joins the list, it would be great if they could be
prompted to introduce them
Bob and everyone else to whom it may concern,
Outside of the US many people pay to their internet provider the *time*
they are connected.
An attachment of more than 300kB divided by transfer rate multiplied by
charge multiplied by number of people affected - that sums up to quite a
substancial am
At 14:54 2.12.2000 +0530, Ms. Janet Pinto wrote:
according to my viruswatch the attachment contains a Virus!!
Don't open it. Just delete the message.
cu,
Christoph
*
*
==
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change yo
At 19:26 14.11.2000 +, you wrote:
That's true. I think we should use RTF format. I normally
don't open Doc files. I made an exception in this case.
And I have always a very recent version of an anti-virus,
but in some cases this is not enough...
...
Again, I would suggest we use all the
Dear all,
may I draw your attention to a never ending story. The title is:
"Two good reasons #not# to send documents in a proprietary file format."
Most users arent' aware of the risks they take, nor how easy the remedy is.
Let me contribute to a little more awareness and knowledge.
1.
*.DOC f
16 matches
Mail list logo
