Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-24 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
Hi John The next step would probably to identify some purpose in form of a research questions. What is it that we are looking for, so that we can start to think about what to measure. On Friday, 21 November 2014, John Baxter via OSList oslist@lists.openspacetech.org wrote: Hi Kari I like

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-24 Thread Royle, Karl via OSList
To: John Baxter j...@jsbaxter.com.aumailto:j...@jsbaxter.com.au, World wide Open Space Technology email list oslist@lists.openspacetech.orgmailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org Subject: Re: [OSList] Critical Testing Hi John The next step would probably to identify some purpose in form of a research

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-24 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
Hi John The next step would probably to identify some purpose in form of a research questions. What is it that we are looking for, so that we can start to think about what to measure. On Friday, 21 November 2014, John Baxter via OSList oslist@lists.openspacetech.org wrote: Hi Kari I like

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-24 Thread Royle, Karl via OSList
To: John Baxter j...@jsbaxter.com.aumailto:j...@jsbaxter.com.au, World wide Open Space Technology email list oslist@lists.openspacetech.orgmailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org Subject: Re: [OSList] Critical Testing Hi John The next step would probably to identify some purpose in form of a research

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-24 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
Hi John The next step would probably to identify some purpose in form of a research questions. What is it that we are looking for, so that we can start to think about what to measure. On Friday, 21 November 2014, John Baxter via OSList oslist@lists.openspacetech.org wrote: Hi Kari I like

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-24 Thread Royle, Karl via OSList
To: John Baxter j...@jsbaxter.com.aumailto:j...@jsbaxter.com.au, World wide Open Space Technology email list oslist@lists.openspacetech.orgmailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org Subject: Re: [OSList] Critical Testing Hi John The next step would probably to identify some purpose in form of a research

[OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
There is an invitation to some scientific rigor for our beloved technology. I propose we accept this invitation as a communal effort. An idea for a trial design would be to collect survey data where the nuances of the lived experiences would be teased out, survey data collected by cooperation

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Daniel Mezick via OSList
Hi Kári, Thank you for making your proposals. They are very interesting! Daniel On 11/20/14 6:34 AM, Kári Gunnarsson via OSList wrote: There is an invitation to some scientific rigor for our beloved technology. I propose we accept this invitation as a communal effort. An idea for a trial

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
Hi Daniel You are welcome. My tiered English was not at it best in the first post, but I hope the spellchecker managed to make my writing readable. Well there is always the purpose of the occasion and how it plays out. I would now be interested how different participatory processes work for

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread John Baxter via OSList
Hi Kari I like your intent, but I hear you when you say you fear it may be far too difficult. Do you have any thoughts on viable first steps? (Beyond the immediate step of sharing intent to see what comes of it!) I am thinking of what in startup language is 'minimum viable product'. Cheers

[OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
There is an invitation to some scientific rigor for our beloved technology. I propose we accept this invitation as a communal effort. An idea for a trial design would be to collect survey data where the nuances of the lived experiences would be teased out, survey data collected by cooperation

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Daniel Mezick via OSList
Hi Kári, Thank you for making your proposals. They are very interesting! Daniel On 11/20/14 6:34 AM, Kári Gunnarsson via OSList wrote: There is an invitation to some scientific rigor for our beloved technology. I propose we accept this invitation as a communal effort. An idea for a trial

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
Hi Daniel You are welcome. My tiered English was not at it best in the first post, but I hope the spellchecker managed to make my writing readable. Well there is always the purpose of the occasion and how it plays out. I would now be interested how different participatory processes work for

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread John Baxter via OSList
Hi Kari I like your intent, but I hear you when you say you fear it may be far too difficult. Do you have any thoughts on viable first steps? (Beyond the immediate step of sharing intent to see what comes of it!) I am thinking of what in startup language is 'minimum viable product'. Cheers

[OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
There is an invitation to some scientific rigor for our beloved technology. I propose we accept this invitation as a communal effort. An idea for a trial design would be to collect survey data where the nuances of the lived experiences would be teased out, survey data collected by cooperation

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Daniel Mezick via OSList
Hi Kári, Thank you for making your proposals. They are very interesting! Daniel On 11/20/14 6:34 AM, Kári Gunnarsson via OSList wrote: There is an invitation to some scientific rigor for our beloved technology. I propose we accept this invitation as a communal effort. An idea for a trial

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread Kári Gunnarsson via OSList
Hi Daniel You are welcome. My tiered English was not at it best in the first post, but I hope the spellchecker managed to make my writing readable. Well there is always the purpose of the occasion and how it plays out. I would now be interested how different participatory processes work for

Re: [OSList] Critical Testing

2014-11-20 Thread John Baxter via OSList
Hi Kari I like your intent, but I hear you when you say you fear it may be far too difficult. Do you have any thoughts on viable first steps? (Beyond the immediate step of sharing intent to see what comes of it!) I am thinking of what in startup language is 'minimum viable product'. Cheers