I continue to experiment with opening small spaces, sometimes in the context
of other processes. I have seen some remarkable breakthroughs, some good
discussions and a couple of fizzles. I do think it relates to the nature of
the group and the task at hand (as it always does). It is a risk, but so
g go." They really believed they were willing and able until
they got into the middle of it.
> So, I wonder what makes the difference in opening small spaces. Is it the
> resonance of the theme? The "tightness" or "looseness" of the community?
> The context in whic
At 09:08 AM 12/15/1998 -, you wrote:
>Howdy, all
>
>Thanks to the 9-10 people who have to date responded so generously to my
request for advice about conducting OS on a beach. Everybody was quite
helpful, actually, except for Harrison, who suggested I use beachbums to
hold up the signs. Beach
Howdy, all
Thanks to the 9-10 people who have to date responded so generously to my
request for advice about conducting OS on a beach. Everybody was quite
helpful, actually, except for Harrison, who suggested I use beachbums to hold
up the signs. Beachbums would that be you, H?
To answer q
practitioners. Most of
>the stories I hear of OS "not working" come from potential clients, often
>describing small spaces.
>
>So, I wonder what makes the difference in opening small spaces. Is it the
>resonance of the theme? The "tightness" or "loosene
come from potential clients, often
describing small spaces.
So, I wonder what makes the difference in opening small spaces. Is it the
resonance of the theme? The "tightness" or "looseness" of the community?
The context in which the space is being opened?
Anyone have some thoughts on this?
Peg Holman
