The several responses to my posting of the short piece I wrote for Raffi
raised some of the issues around Theory in Open Space. A friend once
remarked that the world could be divided between what he called "Theory
Folks" and "Practice Folks" - those who like to think about it, and those
who prefer
Harrison,
You wrote, "A friend once remarked that the world could be divided between
what he called "Theory Folks" and "Practice Folks" - those who like to think
about it, and those who prefer to do it." I have an extended version of
your friends remark. I see it on a continuum starting with thos
Harrison asked, "And now what?"
And before that he described two conceptual bases he has found useful:
Complexity Theory, and Consciousness Studies.
Although "consciousness studies" is broad enough to (not include but touch)
it, I remind us of the conceptual base of Indigenous Science. Here are
Chris--
Yes!!
Joelle
*
*
==
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
--
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.ht
Chris et all,
Your emerging thinking of the OST Facilitator's role as a "ceremonialist"
really resonates for me.
Many thanks for this thread of princples of indigenours science too. Yet
another fine rabbitt hole to explore...
Ann Badillo
Palo Alto, CA
On 5/16/06 9:01 PM, "Chris Weaver" wrote:
Hi.
This conversation thread inspired me to retrieve some of my old notes on
Complexity Theory and Chaordic Systems Theory. The notes originally came
about because I was investigating (exploring and experimenting) possible
theoretical models for "living in Open Space' as a "Life Practice". I hav
