Birgitt,
I would like to add one more experience of using Whole Person Process
Facilitation. I have worked as internal consultant for over a year,
working with the liberal adult education in Sweden. I was the manager of a
project with many participants from different areas, municipalities,
regions,
sprungligt meddelande-
Från: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu]För Harrison Owen
Skickat: den 24 juni 2002 14:06
Till: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Ämne: Re: Transfer in Process
At 08:37 PM 6/23/2002 -0400, Doug. Germann wrote:
Harrison, you do seem to use a transfer in process--
Thomas and Michelle,
thank you for describing your successful use of the Whole Person Process
Facilitation including the transfer in process. You clarified well that we
aren't using this at the start of an OST meeting but for all meetings that
require an open but more guided approach includin
At 08:37 PM 6/23/2002 -0400, Doug. Germann wrote:
Harrison, you do seem to use a transfer in process--for you it is silence
and time to look at the people around the circle. That seems true, at least
if what I suspect is going on in a transfer-in, *is* what is going on: you
are breaking the
Michelle--
Thanks for the help me understand this process.
Harrison, you do seem to use a transfer in process--for you it is silence
and time to look at the people around the circle. That seems true, at least
if what I suspect is going on in a transfer-in, *is* what is going on: you
are breaking
Dear Harrison and all,
You wrote:
I simply said why I there -- and that involved a story from South
Africa. And nothing more.So yes, as usual, you are right. But No -- we
did not do any Story Telling. But that all came out in the wash over
the next several days. Believe me they told stories --
also, it occurs to me that 'transfer-in' would give rise to
'transfer-out,' no? ...which seems to preserve the duality between
business as usual and business as open space. but we know the two are
really the same, right? so why transfer and where's in?
---
Hi Michael;
I think of transfer in in
Doug I did not answer all of your questions:
Why does it take them so deep?
And what parts of it are necessary? As my experience shows, the dyads may
not be a necessary thing (one more thing to do without?).
---
I am not certain about the theory behind why it takes people deep. Perhaps
B
At 06:41 PM 6/21/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Hey all!
Harrison Owen wrote:
Which brings me to the real reason I would never do anything "up
front" as a transfer in process -- even story telling.
I'm a little confused here... Although I am well aware that opening the
space, by it
Just to add my agreement. I only use the transfer in process when I am NOT
doing open space, but using other process facilitation methods...to
accomplish to a degree what the opening does for OST.
I agree with you Meg...the transfer in process provides an opportunity for
people to be fully
Hey all!
Harrison Owen wrote:
Which brings me to the real reason I would never do anything "up
front" as a transfer in process -- even story telling.
I'm a little confused here... Although I am well aware that opening the
space, by itself, is enough I thought that your recen
and
knew it. Which brings me to the real reason I would never do anything "up
front" as a transfer in process -- even story telling.
Open Space (for me) begins in chaos. Yes, there has to be some degree of
safety (I was hopeful that nobody came armed -- the thought actually went
through
-
From: "Douglas D. Germann, Sr." <76066@compuserve.com>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: Transfer in Process
> Michelle--
>
> OK, that explains it very well. Thank you.
>
> Seems I stumbled on something similar with my process (did I post about it
&
erent line from the whole on which to comment.
We did not do any pairs discussion, just a listening stick circle.
So what does anybody think is going on in this transfer-in process?
Is it breaking their preoccupation with other things, or something more
than that?
Why does it take them so deep?
I fully agree; I wouldn't do any of this at the beginning of an OS
event. That is, what I like so very much at OST: the technique of
preparation and facilitation is already simple in the sense of
clearly condensed to the minimum. You do not need any more additional
X.
Bernd
-
web...@gmx.at, on
Harrison said:
>I find that the long/slow walk/look around the circle is profound. And if
>flows very naturally into the opening. My one concern with "things up >front"
>is that it delays the time that folks actually get into the job.
I have also pretty consistently heard you invite people to
-Original Message-
From: Harrison Owen [mailto:owe...@mindspring.com]
Sent: 19-Jun-02 17:15
To: mcoo...@integralvisions.com
Subject: Re: FW: Transfer in Process
At 09:24 AM 6/19/2002 -0400, Meg Salter wrote:
I wonder if other people here on the listserve could comment on what they
oring this apparent duality in organization, yet?' if
not yet, then when, how, where?
a little musing, for what it's worth. m
Michelle wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Harrison Owen [mailto:owe...@mindspring.com]
> Sent: 19-Jun-02 17:15
> To: mcoo...@integralv
I think Bernd you meant this for the list, so I am forwarding. Sometimes
reply comes just to the sender, sometimes to the whole list!!
Michelle
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Weber [mailto:web...@gmx.at]
Sent: 19-Jun-02 11:07
To: mcoo...@integralvisions.com
Subject: Re: FW: Transfer in
This came just to me and I believe Meg meant it for the list.
Michelle
-Original Message-
From: Meg Salter [mailto:meg.sal...@sympatico.ca]
Sent: 19-Jun-02 09:10
To: mcoo...@integralvisions.com
Subject: Re: Transfer in Process
Thanks Michelle for your explanation and stories.
I wonder
Would you kindly explain what you mean by "transfer-in process?" I am not
sure I understand.
--
Thanks for your question Doug. The short answer is in the first two
paragraphs. The rest are some stories and observations about my experience
using it.
The transfer in pro
21 matches
Mail list logo
