Re: about attachments (lecture! ;-)

In a message dated 2/10/99 1:17:40 AM, you wrote: > Sorry to jump in late. I'm a Mac user. And I

Re: about attachments (lecture! ;-)

Folks, I agree with Koos. Attachments are generally considered inappropriate for lists. The OST website would be a great place, since such attachments would be available even to future participants. Best, Murli .. Murli Nagasundaram, Ph.D., Asst. Prof., C

Re: about attachments (lecture! ;-)

koos, et. al. i'd be glad to post most anything to the web for the purposes of sharing. i have the space and the capability to deal with most file types, i think. worst case, i can print it out and scan it back in. might take me a week or two to get it posted, depending on what else is going on,

Re: about attachments (lecture! ;-)

Peg Holman -Original Message- From: koos de heer To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Date: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 12:19 AM Subject: about attachments (lecture! ;-) >Dear folks, > >For those who know everything about attachments: >there is a practical proposal on h

about attachments (lecture! ;-)

Dear folks, For those who know everything about attachments: there is a practical proposal on how to handle binary files on this list at the end of this message. You may skip the lecture. Sometimes we want to share information that is hard to put in the text of an email message. Binary files like