Great question Susanne - you wrote:
My second issue is about that phenomen, that people seems to get always
empowered by open space, taking more responsibility, contribute if you let
them ... and than they go on with it, but the former mode of control from
the top often rebuilds quite fast, cause
In a message dated 7/3/03 1:42:00 AM, dlgottl...@chello.nl writes:
<< >So what positiv point could they make to "loosing" or "give up" control?
>What could be attractiv about that to them?
>What if they would make themselfs unneccesary in the whole process of the
>organization?
>>
Susanne, D
Susanne--
What you write ties in directly with something I wrote just yesterday and
sent to some friends. Here it is--it might give you some additional things
to consider in your question:
===clip
Footprints in the Wind/sm # 393
ooOOOoo
o
NX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
tel: +31(0)20 776 8043
email: dlgottl...@chello.nl
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu]Namens Susanne Hildebrand
Verzonden: donderdag 3 juli 2003 10:14
Aan: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Onderwerp: lights &/ shadows?
Hi
Hi everybody,
I´m still working myself through tons of literatur, enjoying it but and
again feeling my lack of experience. So I like to share some thougts of
mine:
I have the image, that open space works always on the "mass of people",
because it´s great, as we all know. What is with the ones, wh
At 10:14 AM 7/3/2003 +0200, Susanne wrote:
I have the image, that open space works always on the "mass of people",
because it´s great, as we all know. What is with the ones, who are not able
to take really part, cause of language problems, who gave up by life
experience they could try to make a d
