Re: [osmosis-dev] Replication Changes

2009-11-20 Thread Brett Henderson
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Lars Francke wrote: > Once again: Thanks for all your work on this! > After taking a stab at it myself I certainly have a new appreciation > for what you've done. > Hehe, I started doing this in 2006 I think and thought it'd be done and dusted in a few months. 3

Re: [osmosis-dev] Replication Changes

2009-11-20 Thread Peter Körner
Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > > Brett Henderson wrote: >> There is a new (as yet undocumented) task in osmosis called >> --simplify-change which allows a full history diff to be collapsed into >> an older style delta diff. > > In a scenario where you use --rri to retrieve a set of combined m

Re: [osmosis-dev] Replication Changes

2009-11-19 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Brett Henderson wrote: > There is a new (as yet undocumented) task in osmosis called > --simplify-change which allows a full history diff to be collapsed into > an older style delta diff. In a scenario where you use --rri to retrieve a set of combined minute diffs, and if you continue wi

Re: [osmosis-dev] Replication Changes

2009-11-19 Thread Lars Francke
Once again: Thanks for all your work on this! After taking a stab at it myself I certainly have a new appreciation for what you've done. > The "history" diffs are in the process of being generated and are well > through 2008 as we speak.  These are effectively daily diffs but aren't > getting dele

[osmosis-dev] Replication Changes

2009-11-19 Thread Brett Henderson
Hi All, I thought I should give an update on recent Osmosis replication changes. The existing "minute" diffs are irreparably broken. The timestamp approach for extracting changes only works if a long delay is used. 1 hour is probably a minimum and unacceptable for supposedly minute diffs. The e