Hi Mateusz,
auto-cancellation on Travis is enabled. It only cancels pending builds
though, so does not kick in for force pushes if the build is already
running.
The Travis situation has been quite unsatisfactory recently, mostly due to
slow Mac OS builds. We are trying to come up with solutions t
Hi Johan,
On 2 February 2018 at 10:12, Johan Uhle wrote:
>
> auto-cancellation on Travis is enabled. It only cancels pending builds
> though, so does not kick in for force pushes if the build is already
> running.
Yes, it cancels pending only indeed.
I just had an impression that it did not canc
I think you should be able to cancel builds manually as well, so that might
be the way to go in this specific case.
Best,
Johan
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On 2 February 2018 at 10:12, Johan Uhle wrote:
> >
> > auto-cancellation on Travis is enabled.
There is an issue with Travis CI
https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/4867 about this.
Sadly doesn't look it would be getting solved soon.
Cheers,
Patrick
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> I thought that would be the case too.
> Unfortunately, I can not cancel an
I thought that would be the case too.
Unfortunately, I can not cancel any builds at
https://travis-ci.org/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/
I can cancel builds of projects where I'm a member/developer though.
Mateusz
On 2 February 2018 at 11:44, Johan Uhle wrote:
> I think you should be able to cancel
Hi Daniel,
Many thanks for the reply again. An update: turns out when I rebooted
the machine to fix the issue with running osrm-datastore across
different users, I had forgotten that changes to /etc/sysctl.conf are
not persisted after rebooting, so all is working fine now after adding
the ker
Hey Kieran,
Thanks for the update. I'll try simulating this condition locally and see
if we can get a better error message out of the code here - it'll save
folks time in the future if we don't have to repeat this exercise :-)
daniel
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Kieran Caplice
wrote:
> Hi