> But that change actually breaks the intended change - binary exchange
> protocol.
Fair point. It breaks the new interface.
An alternative could be to offer the old and new interfaces together.
That will resolve the breaking change and not introduce a new one.
But there would be two ways to
Actually i just realized, that i've made a patch for libosrmc a year ago:
https://github.com/daniel-j-h/libosrmc/pull/17
I'll ask the libosrmc maintainter to check it one more time.
вс, 18 окт. 2020 г. в 19:55, Denis Chapligin :
> But that change actually breaks the intended change - binary
But that change actually breaks the intended change - binary exchange
protocol.
вс, 18 окт. 2020 г. в 08:37, Michael Bell :
> I've had a go at reverting the breaking change:
> https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5860
> I was able to compile libosrmc against it.
>
> Michael
>
> On
Thanks a lot Daniel, Denis and Michael for your answers.
Michael, I did not go through the details of your changes in PR #5860,
but I gave a go at building and installing. I can confirm that the
dowstream compilation problem reported in #5741 is gone with your changes.
Regards
Julien
On
