2015 1:29 PM
To: osrm-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSRM-talk] Some OSRM Match questions
Sorry, wrong subject line. Reposting to link the thread.
I'm also starting to use this API (and completely love the results).
It appears the default for –max-matching-size is 2. Is there a reaso
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:07:32 +0100
From: Patrick Niklaus
To: Mailing list to discuss Project OSRM
Subject: Re: [OSRM-talk] Some OSRM Match questions
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Which is the recommended way?
Increase the locations limit. Stitching togeth
If you're using osrm-routed, there's no real limit. That actually screams
Denial Of Service at me, we should consider implementing something.
Currently, the only limit would be on the client side.
daniel
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 2:25 AM, Sander Deryckere wrote:
>
> I think you can also be limit
I think you can also be limited by the maximum length of the url:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2659952/maximum-length-of-http-get-request
If you have 1000 points, each with exact lat-lon, timestamp and hint,
you'll easily reach the max. Encoding it as a polyline might help to
increase that l
> Which is the recommended way?
Increase the locations limit. Stitching together split traces might
not yield the expected result (start/end points at the split don't
have to match). In general the more data you provide, the better the
algorithm is able to work.
> Are the timestamps used as part
Hello,
I'm new to OSRM and I have few question regarding the map matching API.
I'm using version v4.8.1.
If I have a trip with 1000 locations, what are the implications of setting
-max-matching-size option of osrm-routed as oppose to splitting the trip
into 10 requests with 100 locations each an
