[ossec-list] Netscreen Firewall Logs

2012-08-15 Thread Ozgur Orhan
Hi All, We have issues configuring Ossec server to receive Netscreen firewall logs. Logs are decoded as syslog not netscreen firewall. Here are my configuration steps; First, firewalls are configured sending audit logs via syslog. We changed ossec.conf file as below to allow syslog; remote

Re: [ossec-list] ossec fails to compile after recent updates from https://bitbucket.org/dcid/ossec-hids

2012-08-15 Thread Peter M Abraham
HI Dan: I did the following: /usr/local/bin/hg pull /usr/local/bin/hg update What would I change above to include a merge or do a merge instead? Thank you. '

[ossec-list] Re: ossec fails to compile after recent updates from https://bitbucket.org/dcid/ossec-hids

2012-08-15 Thread Peter M Abraham
Hi JB: /* Some Global names */ local #define __name GSS HIDS #define __version v2.6 === #define __name OSSEC HIDS #define __version v2012-08 Thank you.

Re: [ossec-list] Re: ossec fails to compile after recent updates from https://bitbucket.org/dcid/ossec-hids

2012-08-15 Thread dan (ddp)
Yep, that's definitely an incomplete merge. I'd get rid of the following: local #define __name GSS HIDS #define __version v2.6 === and try again. (hg resolve --mark src/headers/defs.h hg commit -m merge) On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Peter M Abraham peter.abra...@dynamicnet.net

Re: [ossec-list] ossec fails to compile after recent updates from https://bitbucket.org/dcid/ossec-hids

2012-08-15 Thread dan (ddp)
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Peter M Abraham peter.abra...@dynamicnet.net wrote: HI Dan: I did the following: /usr/local/bin/hg pull /usr/local/bin/hg update What would I change above to include a merge or do a merge instead? Thank you. ' If you changed the source

Re: [ossec-list] Netscreen Firewall Logs

2012-08-15 Thread dan (ddp)
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Ozgur Orhan oor...@ford.com.tr wrote: Hi All, We have issues configuring Ossec server to receive Netscreen firewall logs. Logs are decoded as syslog not netscreen firewall. Here are my configuration steps; First, firewalls are configured sending

Re: [ossec-list] proftpd frequency response not triggered

2012-08-15 Thread dan (ddp)
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Gil Vidals gvid...@gmail.com wrote: I need in understanding why the frequency rule in proftpd_rules.xml isn't triggering. I ran the following log line through ossec-logtest more than 15 times and yet active response isn't triggered: Aug 10 23:22:54 184.5.70.39

Re: [ossec-list] ISS and Server 2k8

2012-08-15 Thread dan (ddp)
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Patrick mrp...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know where I'm going wrong with this Server 2k8 R2 running IIS OSSEC 2.6, all installation and changes have been done using 'Run as administrator' We've moved the log files to: C:\inetpub\logs\LogFiles We have a

Re: [ossec-list] active response not triggering; how to debug?

2012-08-15 Thread dan (ddp)
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Gil Vidals gvid...@gmail.com wrote: How can I debug why the active response is failing for a rule with level 9 and active response is set to level 8? Both the alert and ossec-logtest show the rule is triggering as expected and yet no firewall-drop.sh is

[ossec-list] Simplest question ever (?) - timestamp

2012-08-15 Thread Kat
Is there a way to tell OSSEC to use the timestamp of the actual logfile entry rather than its own internal timestamp of when it sees the alert? This should be a configuration option - *hint hint* Unless there is already a way to do this. thanks K

Re: [ossec-list] Simplest question ever (?) - timestamp

2012-08-15 Thread dan (ddp)
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Kat uncommon...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to tell OSSEC to use the timestamp of the actual logfile entry rather than its own internal timestamp of when it sees the alert? This should be a configuration option - *hint hint* Unless there is already a way

Re: [ossec-list] Simplest question ever (?) - timestamp

2012-08-15 Thread Daniel Cid
Yes, we could do some interesting rules there :) The issue is that OSSEC stores the alerts in a sequential mode and it wouldn't be able to go back in time and store the alerts on the proper position based on the log time. Plus, it would be a big mess if servers are on a different timezone or do

[ossec-list] Fwd: RE:GeoIP Patch

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Starks
We have the OK from Xavier to use his code... Original Message Subject:RE:GeoIP Patch Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:40:30 + (UTC) From: Xavier Mertens via LinkedIn mem...@linkedin.com Reply-To: Xavier Mertens xav...@rootshell.be To: Michael Starks

Re: [ossec-list] Simplest question ever (?) - timestamp

2012-08-15 Thread Steven B.
What about setting the frequency to something really low like 60? Will the agent try to check in every minute? Will the time stamp then be more accurate, assuming the core isnt too busy to handle the information. I also assume that there will be a point where the number of agents trying to