Great, thanks.
Benoit, can you please resend your patch with some of Raphael's quotes - or
your own justification - so that in the future we won't forget why we did
this change?
Would have been nice to do what Glauber suggested (try some workload that
can't benefit from compression, e.g., Cassandr
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Hi Benoit, can you please say a few words on why, or why not, to enable
> compression?
>
> Is it a tradeoff, e.g., good for slow disks but bad for fast disks? Is
> good for some applications but bad for others?
>
> I believe our default was m
Hi Benoit, can you please say a few words on why, or why not, to enable
compression?
Is it a tradeoff, e.g., good for slow disks but bad for fast disks? Is good
for some applications but bad for others?
I believe our default was made "off" for a reason. Raphael, do you perhaps
remember why?
--
