On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
> I think that rather than implementing your suggestion which might not be
> all that trivial I would rather implement some kind of proper LRU based
> solution which would work like so:
>
This can work. Intererstingly, in the first patch wh
Alternatively if the LRU cache idea is too complicated to implement we
could instead have a simple hashmap by node-id type of cache with some TTL
when memory buffer would be freed eventually. This would be unbounded
inodes accessed count wise but it would be still limited to how big
individual
I think that rather than implementing your suggestion which might not be
all that trivial I would rather implement some kind of proper LRU based
solution which would work like so:
- Every time mfs_read() called it would try to find corresponding buffer
in it LRU cache (i-node is a key)
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
> You probably need to expose the port 1121 by adding forward option like so:
>
> scripts/run.py -e "memcached -u root" --forward "tcp:1121::1121"
>
Right. By default, run.py runs the image you just built
(build/latest/usr.img) with qemu us
You probably need to expose the port 1121 by adding forward option like so:
scripts/run.py -e "memcached -u root" --forward "tcp:1121::1121"
On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 7:24:41 PM UTC-5, answe...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I run Memcached image successfully, but I don't know how to use it.
>
>
> w
