This patch depends on the patch that adds the dl_test module.
Test cases are all passed in linux but some fail on osv.
Signed-off-by: Zhiting Zhu
---
core/elf.cc | 25 +
include/osv/elf.hh | 1 +
libc/dlfcn.cc | 5 +-
modules/tests/Makefile | 2 +
modules/t
This test files are for testing dlfcn related functions
Signed-off-by: Zhiting Zhu
---
.gitignore| 2 +
modules/dl_tests/Makefile | 106 ++
2 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 modules/dl_tests/Makefile
diff --git a/.gitign
The tests I commented out is for running them on linux. The dlerror output
is different from glibc and I commented out the one used in linux.
The additional tests that's added in tst-dlfcn.cc is copy from
dlfcn_test.cpp in bionic and change the test framework from gtest to boost
unit test. I can'
I am not sure I fully grasp the difference between RTLD_GLOBAL
and RTLD_LOCAL, but I think right OSv behaves as if RTLD_GLOBAL was passed
which I think is wrong per
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/dlopen.3.html which states that
RTLD_LOCAL is the default when neither flag is set. The symbo
Is there anything wrong/deficient with this patch that prevents us from
applying it?
On Thursday, December 26, 2019 at 10:22:46 PM UTC-5, Waldek Kozaczuk wrote:
>
> The commit
> https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv/commit/ed1eed7a567ec17138c65f0a5628c2311603c712
>
> enhanced dynamic linker
Is there anything wrong/deficient with this patch that prevents us from
applying it?
On Thursday, December 26, 2019 at 10:34:50 PM UTC-5, Waldek Kozaczuk wrote:
>
> As the issue #1067 explains, sometimes INIT functions create threads that
> reference
> symbols from the object being initialzed.
Thanks. I can confirm that this fixes the arm problem (I built on Fedora
30), so I committed.
I don't know enough about what this DTB thing is supposed to be and whether
we might actually need it after the boot, but if we do, we can fix that
then, I guess...
--
Nadav Har'El
n...@scylladb.com
On
From: Waldemar Kozaczuk
Committer: Nadav Har'El
Branch: master
arm: do not relocate DTB, instead read it ahead of time
As noted in one of the email threads, the aarch64 build of OSv fails
to boot with the following error: "dtb_setup: failed to move dtb (dtb too
large?)".
It turns out that
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:17 AM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote:
> Happy New Year everyone!
>
> A couple of days ago I sent a patch that fixes an issue with large DTB and
> thus brings the arm port of OSv back to life.
>
Thanks, great. I can confirm the "dtb too large?" problem. I'll review and
commit your
