On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:48 AM Waldemar Kozaczuk
wrote:
> This patch eliminates one more file - unistd/ttyname.c - that is
> identical with the musl copy except for extra 'memset(buf, 0,
> sizeof(buf));' line
> which does not seem necessary.
This is true. Since we call ttyname_r(), it should ta
This patch eliminates one more file - unistd/ttyname.c - that is
identical with the musl copy except for extra 'memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));'
line
which does not seem necessary. There is already existing unit test that
verifies ttyname() and ttyname_r() behavior.
This patch also cleans up OSv spe
