periences of
practitioners, students and educators. For how the 'problem' is defined
dictates both the nature of treatment and the desired outcome.
So, how SHOULD the profession frame the 'problem' and how ARE
practitioners actually framing the 'problem'? If the
I respond yes to the final question
CR
Be yourself. No one can ever tell you you're doing it wrong.
-James Leo Herlihy
*®©***
Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist
** List messages are archived at:
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:59 PM
Subject: Framing the Problem
> Here's another interesting thought, maybe.
>
> If the symptoms of a person with a stroke are put on a continuum, one
> possible example might be:
>
>
> |- High cholesterol ->Stroke
event -
This is the introduction from www.physiotherapy.ca .
Notice the last two words of the fourth paragraph. Is this a simple
statement of fact (that OT and PT have a common beginning) or political
posturing (revision of history to manipulate the future)? Any
comments/observations?
Snip
the fourth course--the one dealing with exercises for soldiers
> nearing discharge--was taught by army sergeants barking out orders in a
> gymnasium.
*winks* is this what you meant by " 'Exercise' as 'Occupation' ", Ron?
anyway, the big fat transnational Insurance companies would love just
Hear ye, hear ye. hope there are some PTs (doesn't matter where they are from)
lurking on this list and hope you will come out and share your thoughts on this or
any other issue.
Best,
Biraj
Ron Carson wrote:
> Well, I was trying to forget the fiasco that I caused about the PT not
> being
eply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Framing the Problem
>
> Here's another interesting thought, maybe.
>
> If the symptoms of a person with a stroke are put on a continuum, one
> possib
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Framing the Problem
>
> I left an entry-level graduate program with the notion of addressing:
> function - Purpose - MEANING.
>
> I learned from my clinical af
Does this really mean occupational therapy, as in the profession of OT?
Are there any Canadian PT's on this list who can explain what this
means?
Very interesting stuff!!
Ron
~
On 7/1/02, McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
M> Physiotherapists made their early mark in Canada during both
Well, I was trying to forget the fiasco that I caused about the PT not
being on the list, thinks for reminding me .
That was quite the learning experience, especially the part about
asking for a vote and then not abiding by the results. For a while
there, I thought I was going to get
10 matches
Mail list logo