Framing the Problem

periences of practitioners, students and educators. For how the 'problem' is defined dictates both the nature of treatment and the desired outcome. So, how SHOULD the profession frame the 'problem' and how ARE practitioners actually framing the 'problem'? If the

Re: Framing the Problem

I respond yes to the final question CR Be yourself. No one can ever tell you you're doing it wrong. -James Leo Herlihy *®©*** Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist ** List messages are archived at:

Re: Framing the Problem

PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:59 PM Subject: Framing the Problem > Here's another interesting thought, maybe. > > If the symptoms of a person with a stroke are put on a continuum, one > possible example might be: > > > |- High cholesterol ->Stroke event -

Re: Framing the Problem

This is the introduction from www.physiotherapy.ca . Notice the last two words of the fourth paragraph. Is this a simple statement of fact (that OT and PT have a common beginning) or political posturing (revision of history to manipulate the future)? Any comments/observations?

Re: Framing the Problem

Snip the fourth course--the one dealing with exercises for soldiers > nearing discharge--was taught by army sergeants barking out orders in a > gymnasium. *winks* is this what you meant by " 'Exercise' as 'Occupation' ", Ron? anyway, the big fat transnational Insurance companies would love just

Re: Framing the problem

Hear ye, hear ye. hope there are some PTs (doesn't matter where they are from) lurking on this list and hope you will come out and share your thoughts on this or any other issue. Best, Biraj Ron Carson wrote: > Well, I was trying to forget the fiasco that I caused about the PT not > being

RE: Framing the Problem

eply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Framing the Problem > > Here's another interesting thought, maybe. > > If the symptoms of a person with a stroke are put on a continuum, one > possib

RE: Framing the Problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Framing the Problem > > I left an entry-level graduate program with the notion of addressing: > function - Purpose - MEANING. > > I learned from my clinical af

Re[2]: Framing the Problem

Does this really mean occupational therapy, as in the profession of OT? Are there any Canadian PT's on this list who can explain what this means? Very interesting stuff!! Ron ~ On 7/1/02, McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: M> Physiotherapists made their early mark in Canada during both

Re[2]: Framing the problem

Well, I was trying to forget the fiasco that I caused about the PT not being on the list, thinks for reminding me . That was quite the learning experience, especially the part about asking for a vote and then not abiding by the results. For a while there, I thought I was going to get