On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:12:24PM +, Jay R. Ashworth via Outages wrote:
> Well, it seems equivocal whether that's about *this* outage
> rather than an earlier one -- though it's clearly not from 2010.
It's from 2010
https://engineering.fb.com/2010/09/23/uncategorized/more-details-on-today-s-
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:18, Steve Meuse via Outages
wrote:
> Are people using max-prefix for iBGP sessions?
>
> That seems.unwise.
>
Yes, I find it hard to imagine what risks would be mitigated by applying
max-prefix limits to IBGP sessions.
Kind regards,
Job
>
_
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 06:17:12AM +, Jeremy Chadwick via Outages wrote:
> $ telnet route-server.ip.att.net 80
> Trying 12.0.1.28...
> telnet: connect to address 12.0.1.28: Connection refused
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
It's a telnet service:
$ telnet route-server.ip.att.net
Tr
Hi Robert, others,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 05:23:58PM +, Robert Heuvel via Outages wrote:
> That is a Route Validation issue.
I'm not sure it is!
> The IP 35.209.30.41 is part of 35.208.0.0/15 for which a ROA has been
> created by AS15169 to be originated by AS15169.
>
> If check the IP on t
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 14:18 Gert Doering via Outages
wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:31:28AM -0400, Jared Mauch via Outages wrote:
> > Anyone else having this problem? Their system is periodically rejecting
> mails and reporting it as invalid IPv6 PTR but there have been no changes
> in my
Rumor has it this is fixed now
___
Outages mailing list
Outages@outages.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages
Hi all,
Speculating... I posted this in the other thread too:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2017-November/010947.html
It appears that a bunch of more-specifics belonging to regional
comcast networks are now visible in the default-free zone. This path
(which I assume was not designed t
If I had to make a guess, a bunch of more-specific routes are
propagated into the Default-Free Zone that should not be there:
BGP routing table entry for 174.54.0.0/15
2914 3356 7016
Nexthop 165.254.255.1 (via 165.254.255.1) from
AS15562_scarlett_IPv4 (165.254.255.1)
Origin IGP, metric
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:19:13PM -0600, Doug Roberts wrote:
> What about 45.31.217.222? It seems to respond from everywhere except NTT:
> https://puu.sh/ss7RV/82cedcec8e.png
double bang for your buck in some cases! :-)
j...@ntt02.ring.nlnog.net:~$ ping 45.31.217.222
PING 45.31.2
Hi Doug,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:08:19PM -0600, Doug Roberts via Outages wrote:
> Here's what I see from here:
>
> https://puu.sh/ss76o/27b9de01e6.png
I can't ping that IP address from anywhere outside AT&T, so this is not
NTT specific.
Used the NLNOG RING to do the measurement: https://ring
10 matches
Mail list logo
