[ovs-dev] Administración y Control del Flujo de Efectivo

2016-11-24 Thread Tesorería y el Manejo del Efectivo
No sufra por la falta de liquidez y cumpla sus obligaciones 4 ADMINISTRACIÓN Y CONTROL DEL FLUJO DE EFECTIVO 08 de diciembre - Zona Reforma (Ciudad de México) - 9:00 a 20:00 Imparte: M.F Víctor Bustos Pineda Optimice este recurso en su organización desarrollando técnicas para mejorar

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovs-router: use correct gw address at lookup output

2016-11-24 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:58:08PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:49:25PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > After commit 0b8da9ae1f38, the output of the gateway was incorrectly > > changed to > > that of the destination address. > > > >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add support for DPDK 16.11

2016-11-24 Thread Loftus, Ciara
> > > On 11/24/2016 04:34 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 11/24/2016 03:59 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote: > > On 11/24/2016 03:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote: > > This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with > DPDK > > v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add support for DPDK 16.11

2016-11-24 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 11/24/2016 04:34 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote: On 11/24/2016 03:59 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote: On 11/24/2016 03:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote: This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with DPDK v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only minor code changes being needed for the

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add support for DPDK 16.11

2016-11-24 Thread Loftus, Ciara
> > > On 11/24/2016 03:59 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote: > >> > >> On 11/24/2016 03:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote: > >>> This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with DPDK > >>> v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only minor code changes being > needed > >>> for the upgrade. > >>> > >>>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add support for DPDK 16.11

2016-11-24 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 11/24/2016 03:59 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote: On 11/24/2016 03:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote: This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with DPDK v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only minor code changes being needed for the upgrade. Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus

Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, 16/17] dpif-netdev: Centralized threads and queues handling code.

2016-11-24 Thread Ilya Maximets
Hi, Daniele. This is not a complete review. I'll continue to checking this. Few high level comments: * Did you thought about splitting 'reconfigure_datapath' apart? It's a very big function. * IMHO, 'reload_all_pmds' is a misleading name for a function which reloads only selected

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add support for DPDK 16.11

2016-11-24 Thread Markos Chandras
Hi Ciara, On 11/24/2016 02:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote: > This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with DPDK There is a typo in "Compatibility" :) > v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only minor code changes being needed > for the upgrade. > > Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add support for DPDK 16.11

2016-11-24 Thread Loftus, Ciara
> > On 11/24/2016 03:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote: > > This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with DPDK > > v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only minor code changes being needed > > for the upgrade. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus > > --- > >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: Add support for DPDK 16.11

2016-11-24 Thread Maxime Coquelin
On 11/24/2016 03:20 PM, Ciara Loftus wrote: This commit announces support for DPDK 16.11. Compaitibilty with DPDK v16.07 is not broken yet thanks to only minor code changes being needed for the upgrade. Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus --- .travis/linux-build.sh| 2

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] openflow: Add OFPC_PORT_BLOCKED to ofp_capabilities

2016-11-24 Thread Ajinkya D Kadam
This patch adds OFPC_PORT_BLOCKED capability to switch features which indicates that protocols outside of OpenFLow, such as Spanning Tree (802.1D) will detect topology loops and block ports to prevent packet loops. If this bit is not set, then its the responsibility of the controller to implement

[ovs-dev] [ovn-kubernetes][]README.md: Set OVS unique system-id

2016-11-24 Thread zhou . huijing
We can't find the mailbox in ovn-kubernetes CONTRIBUTING.md , so can you have any advice for the follow bug ? Thanks https://github.com/openvswitch/ovn-kubernetes/blob/master/README.md commit eafea03e1e071f1f7491e2df29b41d8384c0cabe Author: zhou Huijing Date: Wed