Re: [ovs-dev] Meter in 2.6

2016-12-24 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 08:55:17PM -0700, Amru OM wrote: > Is OVS 2.6 supports OpenFlow Meter in the data-path? or it still uses > OVSDB management > protocol; which relies on Linux TC tool, for rate limiting and QoS. The FAQ is still correct. ___ dev m

[ovs-dev] Meter in 2.6

2016-12-24 Thread Amru OM
Hello, Is OVS 2.6 supports OpenFlow Meter in the data-path? or it still uses OVSDB management protocol; which relies on Linux TC tool, for rate limiting and QoS. Thanks, Amro ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailma

Re: [ovs-dev] 回复: how a trunk port treats untagged packets

2016-12-24 Thread Ben Pfaff
Please don't drop the list. You said that your trunk ports have VLANs 44, 55, and 66. Therefore, they won't pass packets on VLAN 0. On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 04:15:58PM +0800, hebin wrote: > > But when I ping using if0, I can't receive any packets on an interface , which > port's tag=0, on br0. >

[ovs-dev] Bug#828478: Parcel #9850475 shipment problem, please review

2016-12-24 Thread USPS Priority Parcels
Dear Customer, USPS courier was unable to contact you for your parcel delivery. Please check delivery label attached! Yours sincerely, Ryan Lee, USPS Mail Delivery Agent. ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/m

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v8] netdev-dpdk: Enable Rx checksum offloading feature on DPDK physical ports.

2016-12-24 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Sugesh Chandran wrote: > Add Rx checksum offloading feature support on DPDK physical ports. By default, > the Rx checksum offloading is enabled if NIC supports. However, > the checksum offloading can be turned OFF either while adding a new DPDK > physical port to O