On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 13:19 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:41:01AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 10:03 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:47 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:41:01AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 10:03 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:47 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > Commit 618a5b45ae8b ("rhel: Avoid logrotate error if
> >
On 4/16/17, 8:03 AM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 07:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:44:44 +0200
>> Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>>> index 07f89b037681..95a71546e8f2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
> For things that c
Large numbers of interfaces would not cause deep nesting, only large
messages.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 02:36:57PM +0800, 网络尖兵 wrote:
> Thanks for you reply!
> This problem occurred when I was running OpenSwitch on my embedded system. As
> you know, the OpenSwitch use OVS as its control-plane. And
On 04/14/2017 07:38 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:44:46 +0200
> Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>
>> As link-local addresses are only valid for a single interface, we can allow
>> to use the same VNI for multiple independent VXLANs, as long as the used
>> interfaces are distinct.
On 04/14/2017 07:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:44:44 +0200
> Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>> index 07f89b037681..95a71546e8f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>> @@ -2881,11 +2881,39
On 04/14/2017 07:27 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 07:44 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>
>> * Multicast addresses are never valid as local address
>> * Link-local IPv6 unicast addresses may only be used as remote when the
>> local address is link-local as well
>> * Don't allow link-lo
On 4/16/17 8:48 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Excellent. His patches seem to be in. Seems
> commit ce07183282975026716107d36fd3f5f93de76668
> is a good point?
yes. will send later today.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.
On 17-04-16 10:45 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
Johannes or anybody else working on it?
i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
so we can return meaningful messages
example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
taking i
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
I have a patch for
Johannes or anybody else working on it?
i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
so we can return meaningful messages
example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
taking it as a param
For things that call netlink_ack it may be easier if they create
the extac
12 matches
Mail list logo
