rate limiting may be implemented in other ways (such as nova),
this time need to disable rate limiting.
I think it should not remove tc qdisk when ingress_policing_burst
is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Guoshuai Li
Co-authored-by: huweihua
---
lib/netdev-linux.c | 18 +-
1 file chang
Do you need a 3% business/personal loan? email me with loan amount needed and
pay back duration for more details. Thanks.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Hi all,
I just test the prefixes function in flow_tables, It seems not work for tun_src
# ovs-vsctl list flow_table
_uuid : 113ce6a4-f872-450b-b799-e15f3f3af7c1
external_ids: {}
flow_limit : []
groups : []
name: "table0"
overflow_polic
table=4 (ls_out_acl ), priority=2002 , match=(((ct.new &&
!ct.est) || (!ct.new && ct.est && !ct.rpl && ct_label.blocked == 1)) &&
(outport == "372e3aa6-1041-435d-9536-8f1c9e49196b" && ip4 && ip4.src ==
$as_ip4_6a8f4283_ba60_4d1c_9dec_28d027eadef2 && tcp && tcp.dst >= 1
&& tcp.dst
Hi, Numan,
I am curious why default 5 seconds inactivity time does not work? Do
you have more details?
Does the glitch usually happen around the HA switch over? If this
happens during normal operation,
Then this is not HA specific issue, but an indication of some
connectivity issues.
On Thu, O
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:45AM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> Instead of freeing in the error path, move the allocation
> after it. Found by inspection.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Tu
Thanks, applied to master and backported to 2.8.
___
dev mailing lis
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:11:18PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Reported-by: Hui Xiang
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> > ---
>
> Looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Andy Zhou
Thanks! I applied this to master.
__
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:29:16PM -0700, Praveen Kariyanahalli wrote:
> Wanted to know the status of OVS 2.8 DPDK NAT Fragmentation support?
I understand that it's not supported yet. I don't know anyone currently
working on it.
___
dev mailing list
d..
[Reposting on dev forum]
Wanted to know the status of OVS 2.8 DPDK NAT Fragmentation support?
Trying with latest OVS:
# ovs-vsctl show
8864f930-a5e4-428a-9578-c9f441aae5e4
:::
*ovs_version: "2.8.2"*
*Regular packets NATing seems to be working as desired. *
*# ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrac
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Reported-by: Hui Xiang
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
Looks good.
Acked-by: Andy Zhou
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Instead of freeing in the error path, move the allocation
after it. Found by inspection.
Signed-off-by: William Tu
---
lib/netdev.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev.c b/lib/netdev.c
index b4e570bafd08..e47bfe1c831d 100644
--- a/lib/netdev.c
+++
Sure, I will take a look.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Hi Andy. In the IRC meeting today, Numan suggested that you might be an
> appropriate reviewer for this patch, so if you agree and you have a
> chance to look at this then it would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben.
> Thanks for the report and the fix.
>
> I think that we can avoid doing the allocations entirely for this case.
> What do you think of the following? I guess that it moves allocations
> into the lock, but I don't know of a performance bottleneck on this
> lock.
>
> --8<--c
Hi Andy. In the IRC meeting today, Numan suggested that you might be an
appropriate reviewer for this patch, so if you agree and you have a
chance to look at this then it would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ben.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 02:22:33PM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Numan Siddiq
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:26:03AM -0700, William Tu wrote:
> Found by inspection.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Tu
> ---
> lib/netdev.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/netdev.c b/lib/netdev.c
> index b4e570bafd08..bedc21dec48e 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev.c
> +++ b/lib
Found by inspection.
Signed-off-by: William Tu
---
lib/netdev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/netdev.c b/lib/netdev.c
index b4e570bafd08..bedc21dec48e 100644
--- a/lib/netdev.c
+++ b/lib/netdev.c
@@ -2220,6 +2220,8 @@ netdev_ports_insert(struct netdev *netdev, const s
Reported-by: Hui Xiang
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
AUTHORS.rst | 1 +
vswitchd/vswitch.xml | 30 +-
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/AUTHORS.rst b/AUTHORS.rst
index 3a845fdd424b..4a80802dd625 100644
--- a/AUTHORS.rst
+++ b/AUTH
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 05:35:13PM +0800, Wei Li wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I have some confused about "Crossproducting" in ovn-sb
>
> I create acl in ovn-sb like this
> match : "tcp.src == {1, 2} && tcp.dst == {1,
> 2} && ip4.src == {1.1.1.1/32, 2.2.2.2/32} && ip4.
>
> Hi Ciara,
>
> These improvements look very good. I would expect even bigger
> improvements for big packets, as long as we don't hit some link bandwidth
> limitations. But at least the vhost-vhost cases should benefit.
>
> Have you also tested larger packet sizes?
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the fee
Hello everyone
I have some confused about "Crossproducting" in ovn-sb
I create acl in ovn-sb like this
match : "tcp.src == {1, 2} && tcp.dst == {1,
2} && ip4.src == {1.1.1.1/32, 2.2.2.2/32} && ip4.dst == {1.1.1.1/32,
2.2.2.2/32}"
ovs-ofctl dump-flows like this
Hello,
Are there are any other comments?
Thank you all in advance.
Br,
Michal.
> -Original Message-
> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org
> [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Weglicki, MichalX
> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 10:19 AM
> To: Greg Rose ; d...@
21 matches
Mail list logo