NSH RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8300
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On 18.01.2018 02:21, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Answers inline.
> Regards, Jan
>
>
>> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 11:47
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] netdev: Add rxq callback function rxq_length()
>>
>> On
I was told more tests and reviews are needed from yesterday's meeting.
For testing, as you can see below, Finn already have done some performance
testing covering quite few testcases. I have also done some very basic
performance testing, basically just with rxonly.
Besides that, I have actually
On 1/17/2018 4:15 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:24:21PM -0800, Greg Rose wrote:
On minimal install RHEL 7 servers (and perhaps other types of installs)
you need to enable a couple of optional repositories for the yum-builddep
utility to work correctly. This patch
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:15:31PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:24:21PM -0800, Greg Rose wrote:
> > On minimal install RHEL 7 servers (and perhaps other types of installs)
> > you need to enable a couple of optional repositories for the yum-builddep
> > utility to work
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:24:21PM -0800, Greg Rose wrote:
> On minimal install RHEL 7 servers (and perhaps other types of installs)
> you need to enable a couple of optional repositories for the yum-builddep
> utility to work correctly. This patch documents those two optional
> repositories.
>
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:10:17AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:51:20PM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> > > You mean add more details to NEWS file explaining that change?
> >
> > I am not much familiar with documentation part of ovs. It will help if
> > others can
Today OVS pushes packets to the TAP interface ignoring its
current state. That works because the kernel will return -EIO
when it's not UP and OVS will just ignore that as it is not
an OVS issue.
However, it causes a huge impact when broadcasts happen when
using userspace datapath accelerated with
Thanks for the review. Answers inline.
Regards, Jan
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 January, 2018 11:47
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] netdev: Add rxq callback function rxq_length()
>
> On 16.01.2018 04:51, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> > If implememented,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:42:34AM -0800, Guru Shetty wrote:
> On 17 January 2018 at 07:57, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > One of the reasons is to clean up a bit because today it is not
> > obvious that openvswitch.spec uses initscripts and shouldn't be
> > used
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:01:38AM -0800, Greg Rose wrote:
> Patch c49889cf3e "rhel: Ensure proper OVS kernel modules load after upgrade"
> did not address the RHEL 6 kmod rpm spec file. This patch addresses
> that error.
>
> Fixes: c49889cf3e ("rhel: Ensure proper OVS kernel modules...")
> CC:
Thanks for the fix. I'd like to add the compiler to the description, since I
didn't see it on gcc 5.4.0.
--Justin
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 6:05 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>
> The result of a ternary operation will be promoted at least to int
> type. As such, the compiler may
> On Jan 17, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:54:40AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
>
> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
Thanks. I pushed this to master.
--Justin
> On Jan 17, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:54:39AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
>
> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
I created branch-2.9, and pushed this to master and there.
--Justin
On minimal install RHEL 7 servers (and perhaps other types of installs)
you need to enable a couple of optional repositories for the yum-builddep
utility to work correctly. This patch documents those two optional
repositories.
Signed-off-by: Greg Rose
---
Datos aplicados de forma clara, detallada y estratégica
Nuevas Normas de Información Financiera 2018
26 de enero- CPC. José Frank González Sánchez - 9am-8pm
Las NIF (Normas de Información Financiera, antes Principios de Contabilidad),
emitidas por el Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información
From: Daniel Axtens
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:09:17 +1100
> When regular packets are forwarded, we validate their size against the
> MTU of the destination device. However, when GSO packets are
> forwarded, we do not validate their size against the MTU. We
> implicitly assume
Hi,
Assuming that all ports use the same MTU, in OVS2.8 and earlier, a single
mempool of 256K buffers (MAX_NB_MBUF = 4096 * 64) will be created and shared by
all the ports
With the OVS2.9 mempool patches, we have port specific allocation and the
number of mbufs created for each port is based
Hi Ben,
The following changes since commit 1fb924b8091b7ee33020b28c2826e096a7d42ef0:
Documentation: Update Faucet tutorial. (2018-01-17 10:18:27 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge
for you to fetch changes up to
> The result of a ternary operation will be promoted at least to int type.
> As such, the compiler may generate a warning as:
> format specifies type 'unsigned char' but the argument has type 'int'
>
> Squelch this by preferring the %d format specifier to print 1/0 values.
>
> Fixes:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:38:48PM +1300, Brad Cowie wrote:
> Drop use of minimum_ip_size_check in Faucet tutorial which is no longer
> needed after we fixed a bug that was causing packet length checks to be
> calculated wrong.
Thanks! Applied to master.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:51:20PM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> > You mean add more details to NEWS file explaining that change?
>
> I am not much familiar with documentation part of ovs. It will help if
> others can comment on where this change should be documented.
vswitchd/vswitch.xml
On 17 January 2018 at 08:01, Greg Rose wrote:
> Patch c49889cf3e "rhel: Ensure proper OVS kernel modules load after upgrade"
> did not address the RHEL 6 kmod rpm spec file. This patch addresses
> that error.
>
> Fixes: c49889cf3e ("rhel: Ensure proper OVS kernel
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:55:40AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Jan 17, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > Justin, do you want to set up the branch for 2.9 today?
>
> Yes. I sent out the patches just now.
Thanks, acked.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:54:40AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:54:39AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Most of the existing tunnels accept 65535 for MTU and internally reduce it
to the maximum value actually supported. However, in RTM_SETLINK calls,
at least GRE tunnels reject MTU larger than actually supported. This
commit changes the MTU used in RTM_NEWLINK calls to use a value that should
be
The kernel GRE driver ignores IFLA_MTU in RTM_NEWLINK requests and
overrides the MTU to 1472 bytes. This commit works around the problem by
following up a request to create a GRE device with a second request to set
the MTU.
Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488484
Most of the existing tunnels accept 65535 for MTU and internally reduce it
to the maximum value actually supported. However, in RTM_SETLINK calls,
at least GRE tunnels reject MTU larger than actually supported. This
commit changes the MTU used in RTM_NEWLINK calls to use a value that should
be
v1->v2:
- Patch 1 is new.
- Patch 2 is revised to use MTU 65000 instead of 65535.
Ben Pfaff (2):
dpif-netlink-rtnl: Use 65000 instead of 65535 as tunnel MTU.
dpif-netlink-rtnl: Work around MTU bug in kernel GRE driver.
lib/dpif-netlink-rtnl.c | 24 +++-
1 file
> On Jan 17, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Justin, do you want to set up the branch for 2.9 today?
Yes. I sent out the patches just now.
Thanks,
--Justin
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
---
NEWS | 2 +-
configure.ac | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index cb020d00d00c..a736b3159751 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Post-v2.8.0
On 17 January 2018 at 07:57, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> One of the reasons is to clean up a bit because today it is not
> obvious that openvswitch.spec uses initscripts and shouldn't be
> used for Fedora or RHEL-7.
>
> Then we have openvswitch-fedora.spec which is not
> You mean add more details to NEWS file explaining that change?
I am not much familiar with documentation part of ovs. It will help if
others can comment on where this change should be documented.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
> It is based on the length of history that is stored about an rxq
> (currently 1 min).
>
> $ ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show
> pmd thread numa_id 0 core_id 4:
> isolated : false
> port: dpdkphy1 queue-id: 0pmd usage: 70 %
> port: dpdkvhost0
Patch c49889cf3e "rhel: Ensure proper OVS kernel modules load after upgrade"
did not address the RHEL 6 kmod rpm spec file. This patch addresses
that error.
Fixes: c49889cf3e ("rhel: Ensure proper OVS kernel modules...")
CC: Ansis Atteka
CC: Flavio Leitner
Hi,
One of the reasons is to clean up a bit because today it is not
obvious that openvswitch.spec uses initscripts and shouldn't be
used for Fedora or RHEL-7.
Then we have openvswitch-fedora.spec which is not obvious if it
works or not in RHEL-7 too.
We could document that somehow, but it
Justin, do you want to set up the branch for 2.9 today?
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:44:08AM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-
> > > boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Flavio Leitner
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:22 AM
> > > To: d...@openvswitch.org
> > >
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:43:08PM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
Hi Vishal,
> I was testing your patch and comparing the stats of tap port for both
> ovs-master
> and your patch. The drop stats are now matching with master.
Thanks for doing that work, I appreciate it!
>
OK - fine with me.
So an alternative patch would be to document that this spec is now
just an alternative for RHEL7 vs one for 5 / 6?
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Guru Shetty wrote:
> We use RHEL6 spec to build rpms for RHEL7 as we still use sysV scripts. We
> will need quite
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:44:08AM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-
> > boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Flavio Leitner
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:22 AM
> > To: d...@openvswitch.org
> > Subject:
Hi Flavio,
I was testing your patch and comparing the stats of tap port for both
ovs-master
and your patch. The drop stats are now matching with master.
However I still see one more difference, in earlier case the "tx_packets" were
also incremented along with "tx_dropped" when the tap port is
Not a full review.
Comments inline.
On 16.01.2018 04:51, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> This patch instruments the dpif-netdev datapath to record detailed
> statistics of what is happening in every iteration of a PMD thread.
>
> The collection of detailed statistics can be controlled by a new
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-
> boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Flavio Leitner
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:22 AM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] netdev-dpdk: add vhost-user get_status.
>
> Expose
On 16.01.2018 04:51, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> If implememented, this function returns the number of packets in an rx
> queue of the netdev. If not implemented, it returns -1.
To be conform with other netdev functions it should return meaningful
error codes. As 'rte_eth_rx_queue_count' could return
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 05:28:18PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a joint work from Mellanox and Napatech, to enable the flow hw
> > offload with the DPDK generic flow interface (rte_flow).
> >
> > The basic idea is to associate the flow with a mark id (a unit32_t
> > number).
47 matches
Mail list logo