On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Kent Overstreet
wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:16:42AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> > +/*
>> > + * Returns pointer to the specified byte @offset within @radix,
>> > allocating it if
>> > + * necessary - newly allocated slots are always zeroed out:
>> > + */
>> > +
Controller Financiero
El contexto empresarial actual exige una estrategia de gestión
y control finaciero acorde a los objetivos y proyectos de futuro de la empresa.
Estas necesidades son resueltas por el Controller Financiero, uno de los
perfiles profesionale
El participante será capaz de:
- Analizar la necesidad y ventajas de conocer la misión, visión y valores
corporativos.
- Conocer cuáles son las cuatro barreras fundamentales que impiden el
establecimiento de una estrategia en nuestras organizaciones.
-Saber que variables posibilitan una estrateg
>
> From: Mark Kavanagh
>
> Currently, packets are only copied to a single segment in
> the function dpdk_do_tx_copy(). This could be an issue in
> the case of jumbo frames, particularly when multi-segment
> mbufs are involved.
>
> This patch calculates the number of segments needed by a
> pack
>
> From: Michael Qiu
>
> When doing packet clone, if packet source is from DPDK driver,
> multi-segment must be considered, and copy the segment's data one by
> one.
>
> Also, lots of DPDK mbuf's info is missed during a copy, like packet
> type, ol_flags, etc. That information is very importa
>
> When enabled with DPDK OvS relies on mbufs allocated by mempools to
> receive and output data on DPDK ports. Until now, each OvS dp_packet has
> only one mbuf associated, which is allocated with the maximum possible
> size, taking the MTU into account. This approach, however, doesn't allow
> u
>
> In its current implementation dp_packet_shift() is also unaware of
> multi-seg mbufs (that holds data in memory non-contiguously) and assumes
> that data exists contiguously in memory, memmove'ing data to perform the
> shift.
>
> To add support for multi-seg mbuds a new set of functions was
>
>
> Most helper functions in dp-packet assume that the data held by a
> dp_packet is contiguous, and perform operations such as pointer
> arithmetic under that assumption. However, with the introduction of
> multi-segment mbufs, where data is non-contiguous, such assumptions are
> no longer possib
>
> The dp_packet_put*() function - dp_packet_put_uninit(), dp_packet_put()
> and dp_packet_put_zeros() - are, in their current implementation,
> operating on the data buffer of a dp_packet as if it were contiguous,
> which in the case of multi-segment mbufs means they operate on the first
> mbuf
>
> From: Mark Kavanagh
>
> There are numerous factors that must be considered when calculating
> the size of an mbuf:
> - the data portion of the mbuf must be sized in accordance With Rx
> buffer alignment (typically 1024B). So, for example, in order to
> successfully receive and capture a
>
> Overview
>
> This patchset introduces support for multi-segment mbufs to OvS-DPDK.
> Multi-segment mbufs are typically used when the size of an mbuf is
> insufficient to contain the entirety of a packet's data. Instead, the
> data is split across numerous mbufs, each carrying a portio
On 28.05.2018 14:06, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> When ping-pong'in a live VM migration between two machines running
> OVS-DPDK every now and then the ping misses would increase
> dramatically. For example:
>
> ===Stream Rate: 3Mpps===
> No Stream_Rate Downtime Totaltime Ping_Loss Moong
On 05/27/2018 06:04 PM, Lam, Tiago wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 25/05/2018 18:22, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> Hi Tiago,
>>
>
> [snip]
>
+
+static struct dpdk_mp *
+dpdk_mp_get(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int mtu, bool per_port_mp)
+{
+struct dpdk_mp *dmp;
+bool reuse
Hello Team,
Could anyone from the list guide me how the Queue mechanism is implemented
in OVS, Please take me to the code where i can explore in detail.
Regards
Rakesh Kumar
9042812130
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.
Hi,
This commit seems to introduce an issue creating an rpm package
using rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in
Because of this line:
-noinst_man_MANS += utilities/ovs-sim.1
ovs-sim.1 man page is now being installed to the rpmbuild folder but
not being packaged by the spec file.
I wanted to suggest
Dear Sir,
We write further to our earlier communication with your firm today.
Please find attached the photos and reports on the damaged Cargo/vessel.
Kindly revert to us soon with the name and moibile number of your attending
surveyor please.
Kind Regards
Kelvin Yip 22
When ping-pong'in a live VM migration between two machines running
OVS-DPDK every now and then the ping misses would increase
dramatically. For example:
===Stream Rate: 3Mpps===
No Stream_Rate Downtime Totaltime Ping_Loss Moongen_Loss
0 3Mpps 128 13974 115
17 matches
Mail list logo
