Hi Ben,
I have not tried it under OVS sandbox. I can test the patch on both OVS
sandbox and my local testbed and update with the results.
Thanks & Regards,
Anil Kumar
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff
Sent: Friday, 1 November, 2019 11:12 PM
To: Ilya Maximets
Cc: Ilya Maximets ; Anil
From: xiangxia.m@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 22:23:44 +0800
> This series patch optimize openvswitch for performance or simplify
> codes.
Series applied, thank you.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
Greetings,
Find the attached mail very confidential. reply for more details
Thanks.
Peter Wong
This email was sent by the shareware version of Postman Professional.
___
dev mailing list
Bleep bloop. Greetings Flavio Fernandes, I am a robot and I have tried out
your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line is 84 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
#86 FILE: Vagrantfile:35:
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone can help me with this. I am having trouble to send
tso/gso packet
with af_packet socket with packet_vnet_hdr (through virtio_net_hdr) over
vxlan tunnel in OVS.
What I observed that, the following function eventually hitting and is
returning false (net/core/skbuff.c),
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 12:05:34PM -0700, Darrell Ball wrote:
> At the same time disambiguate some feature descriptions.
> 'Meters' is changed to 'Meter action' to clarify that the entry
> describes the Openflow meter action rather than port based meters.
> 'NAT' is changed to 'Conntrack NAT' to
Stop usage of python2 as ovs+ovn no longer support it.
Update vagrant boxes to the following revisions:
- Debian: buster (from jessie)
- Fedora: v31 (from v29)
- Centos: 8 (from 7, kinda**)
Centos 7 may still be used, but only if explicitly
provided in command: 'vagrant up centos-7'
Fedora-31's
On 2019-11-03 12:00 PM, 0-day Robot wrote:
> Bleep bloop. Greetings Roi Dayan, I am a robot and I have tried out your
> patch.
> Thanks for your contribution.
>
> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
>
>
> checkpatch:
> WARNING: Line is 83 characters
Bleep bloop. Greetings Roi Dayan, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line is 83 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
#31 FILE:
From: Dmytro Linkin
Currently ofproto design disallow duplicating output packet on forwarding
and mirroring to/from same ovs port. Next scenario reveal lack of design:
1. Send ping between regular ovs ports (VFs, for ex.), stop it.
2. While rule still exist, make mirror for one of the ports.
On 2019-11-02 1:27 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:54:49PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 02:40:35PM +0200, Roi Dayan wrote:
>>> From: Dmytro Linkin
>>>
>>> Tunnel id 0 is not printed unless tunnel flag FLOW_TNL_F_KEY is set.
>>> Fix that by always
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> use the specified functions to init resource.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang
> Tested-by: Greg Rose
Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> Unlocking of a not locked mutex is not allowed.
> Other kernel thread may be in critical section while
> we unlock it because of setting user_feature fail.
>
> Fixes: 95a7233c4 ("net: openvswitch: Set OvS recirc_id from tc chain
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> When we destroy the flow tables which may contain the flow_mask,
> so release the flow mask struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang
> Tested-by: Greg Rose
> ---
Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> The most case *index < ma->max, and flow-mask is not NULL.
> We add un/likely for performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang
> Tested-by: Greg Rose
> Acked-by: William Tu
> ---
Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> The full looking up on flow table traverses all mask array.
> If mask-array is too large, the number of invalid flow-mask
> increase, performance will be drop.
>
> One bad case, for example: M means flow-mask is valid and NULL
>
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> Simplify the code and remove the unnecessary BUILD_BUG_ON.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang
> Tested-by: Greg Rose
> Acked-by: William Tu
> ---
Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar
___
dev
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> Port the codes to linux upstream and with little changes.
>
> Pravin B Shelar, says:
> | In case hash collision on mask cache, OVS does extra flow
> | lookup. Following patch avoid it.
>
> Link:
>
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> When creating and inserting flow-mask, if there is no available
> flow-mask, we realloc the mask array. When removing flow-mask,
> if necessary, we shrink mask array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang
> Tested-by: Greg Rose
>
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> Port the codes to linux upstream and with little changes.
>
> Pravin B Shelar, says:
> | mask caches index of mask in mask_list. On packet recv OVS
> | need to traverse mask-list to get cached mask. Therefore array
> | is better
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> The idea of this optimization comes from a patch which
> is committed in 2014, openvswitch community. The author
> is Pravin B Shelar. In order to get high performance, I
> implement it again. Later patches will use it.
>
> Pravin
21 matches
Mail list logo
