> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 8:48 PM
> To: Ilya Maximets ; Lance Yang (Arm Technology China)
> ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Jieqiang Wang (Arm Technology China) ; Gavin Hu
> (Arm
> Technology China) ; Jingzhao Ni (Arm Technology
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 8:34 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 3:20 PM Frode Nordahl
> wrote:
> >
> > At present when the ``pause`` command is issued any lock the
> > ``ovn-northd`` process holds on the SB DB will be kept.
> >
> > To be able to change this behaviour the tests
Hi Ilya,
No, we didn't test this patch based on OVS-AF_XDP, but made a black build to
enable this in OVS-DPDK and test it.
Currently DPDK-AF_XDP has been tested in latest kernel (not released). So I
think OVS-AF_XDP is close to be supported for aarch64.
Furthermore, I found a document about
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 3:20 PM Frode Nordahl
wrote:
>
> At present when the ``pause`` command is issued any lock the
> ``ovn-northd`` process holds on the SB DB will be kept.
>
> To be able to change this behaviour the tests surrounding pause and
> resume must be changed, thus I provide the
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 6:36 PM
> To: Lance Yang (Arm Technology China) ; Ilya Maximets
> ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Jieqiang Wang (Arm Technology China) ; Gavin Hu
> (Arm
> Technology China) ; Jingzhao Ni (Arm Technology China)
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 7:25 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:55 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:22 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 4:03 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:18 PM Han
Hello and Good day,
I am Ahmed Biener,senior sales manager from RAPHA trading company,import and
export Egypt,We are currently working on a project and wanted to receive
quotation for your goods with list of FOB prices in eqyptian pounds,with prices
attached,Please get back to me as soon as
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:55 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:22 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 4:03 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:18 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at
Thanks Dumitru, please see my comments inlined.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:13 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> This commit transforms the 'changed' field in struct engine_node in a
> 'state' field. Possible node states are:
> - "Stale": data in the node is not up to date with the DB.
> - "Updated":
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:13 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> This commit simplifies the logic of calling engine_run and
engine_need_run in
> order to reduce the number of external variables required to track the
result
> of the last engine execution.
>
> The engine code is also refactored a bit and
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:33:44AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The list of copyright holders was incomplete and out of date. This
> updates it based on a "grep" for copyright notices, which I reviewed by
> hand.
>
> CC: 942...@bugs.debian.org
> Reported-by: Chris Lamb
> Reported-at:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:34:21PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Found by inspection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
Still needs review.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:29:42PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
Still needs review.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 07:33:30AM +, Yanqin Wei (Arm Technology China)
wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks for your time to review. I am sorry not to verify this patch by clang
> compiler. But this patch compiles successfully in gcc 7.4. Maybe in some gcc
> version, the atomic type is
12 de Diciembre | Horario de 10:00 a 17:00 hrs. | (hora del centro de México)
Taller práctico de Planeación Estratégica
A través de las metodologías de planeación, se definen con la participación de
la alta dirección y funcionarios clave las líneas y los objetivos estratégicos
para
la
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:25 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> 'get_datapath_cap' callback was mistakenly placed in
> 'Connection tracking' section of the 'struct dpif_class'
> while belongs to the 'Datapath information'.
>
> CC: William Tu
> Fixes: 27501802d09f ("ofproto-dpif: Expose datapath
'get_datapath_cap' callback was mistakenly placed in
'Connection tracking' section of the 'struct dpif_class'
while belongs to the 'Datapath information'.
CC: William Tu
Fixes: 27501802d09f ("ofproto-dpif: Expose datapath capability to ovsdb.")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
On 26.11.2019 20:43, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 26.11.2019 9:59, Anju Thomas wrote:
>> Currently OVS maintains explicit packet drop/error counters only on port
>> level. Packets that are dropped as part of normal OpenFlow processing are
>> counted in flow stats of “drop” flows or as table misses
On 26.11.2019 9:59, Anju Thomas wrote:
> Currently OVS maintains explicit packet drop/error counters only on port
> level. Packets that are dropped as part of normal OpenFlow processing are
> counted in flow stats of “drop” flows or as table misses in table stats.
> These can only be
On 20.11.2019 16:28, Eli Britstein wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
> Reviewed-by: Oz Shlomo
> ---
> NEWS | 4 +--
> lib/netdev-offload-dpdk-flow.c | 60
> ++
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff
On 20.11.2019 16:28, Eli Britstein wrote:
> From: Ophir Munk
>
> Add flow_stats_get() function to netdev offload class, as a pre-step
> towards implementation of statistics quering fully offloaded flows.
Please, do not introduce new API for each dpif provider.
You need to implement existing
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 22.11.2019 18:51, William Tu wrote:
> > Hi Ilya and Eelco,
> >
> > Yiyang reports very poor TCP performance on his setup and I can
> > also reproduce it on my machine. Somehow I think this might be a
> > kernel issue, but I don't know
On 13.11.2019 18:01, Malvika Gupta wrote:
> The accurate timing implementation in this patch gets the wall clock counter
> via
> cntvct_el0 register access. This call is portable to all aarch64 architectures
> and has been verified on an 64-bit arm server.
>
> Suggested-by: Yanqin Wei
>
On 25.11.2019 22:45, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:24:39PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Handling of OpenFlow PACKET_OUT implies pushing the packet through
>> the datapath and packet processing inside the datapath could trigger
>> an upcall. In case of system datapath,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:46 AM Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Ciara and Ian,
> >
> > I'm checking the zero-copy support on both rx/tx side when
> > using ovs-dpdk with vhostuser and dpdkport.
> > Assuming PVP, IIUC[1,2], the rx (P to V) does not have zero-copy and
> > the V to P has zero
On 26/11/2019 11:31, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> 'dpdkr' a.k.a. DPDK ring ports has really poor support in OVS and not
> tested on a regular basis. These ports are intended to work via
> shared memory with another DPDK secondary process, but there are lots
> of limitations for using this functionality
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:28 PM Eli Britstein wrote:
> >> This series adds HW offload for output, drop, set MAC, set IPv4, set
> >> TCP/UDP ports and tunnel push actions using the DPDK rte_flow API.
> > Has this series been tested with newer DPDK?
> > The best would be with 19.11-rc3, since we
On 26/11/2019 12:03, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
> 18.11.5. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
> ---
> .travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
> Documentation/faq/releases.rst
Hi David,
On 11/26/2019 12:08 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Eli,
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 4:36 PM Eli Britstein wrote:
>> Currently, netdev datapath offload only accelerates the flow match
>> sequence by associating a mark per flow. This series introduces the full
>> offload of netdev
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:32 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> 'dpdkr' a.k.a. DPDK ring ports has really poor support in OVS and not
> tested on a regular basis. These ports are intended to work via
> shared memory with another DPDK secondary process, but there are lots
> of limitations for using
Ilya Maximets writes:
> 'dpdkr' a.k.a. DPDK ring ports has really poor support in OVS and not
> tested on a regular basis. These ports are intended to work via
> shared memory with another DPDK secondary process, but there are lots
> of limitations for using this functionality in practice.
On 26.11.2019 13:37, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 25.11.2019 7:28, Lance Yang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Ilya Maximets
>>> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 6:36 PM
>>> To: Lance Yang (Arm Technology China) ; Ilya Maximets
>>> ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
On 22.11.2019 11:30, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> We need to define __ARM_NEON, __ARM_NEON__ or __ARM_FEATURE_SIMD32
> depending on the compiler and its version in order to make sparse happy
> while checking DPDK headers on ARM. This also will allow us to check
> same vectorized code that we're
On 25.11.2019 7:28, Lance Yang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ilya Maximets
>> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 6:36 PM
>> To: Lance Yang (Arm Technology China) ; Ilya Maximets
>> ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
>> Cc: Jieqiang Wang (Arm Technology China) ;
On 26.11.2019 13:03, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
> 18.11.5. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
> ---
> .travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
> Documentation/faq/releases.rst
On 11/26/2019 11:31 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
'dpdkr' a.k.a. DPDK ring ports has really poor support in OVS and not
tested on a regular basis. These ports are intended to work via
shared memory with another DPDK secondary process, but there are lots
of limitations for using this functionality
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:31:48PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> 'dpdkr' a.k.a. DPDK ring ports has really poor support in OVS and not
> tested on a regular basis. These ports are intended to work via
> shared memory with another DPDK secondary process, but there are lots
> of limitations for
Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
18.11.5. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
---
.travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst |
Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
18.11.5. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
---
.travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 4 ++--
Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
18.11.5. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
---
.travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst |
Introduce IPv6 Prefix delegation state machine according to RFC 3633
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3633.
Add handle_dhcpv6_reply controller action to parse advertise/reply from
IPv6 delegation server.
Introduce logical flows in ovn router pipeline in order to parse dhcpv6
advertise/reply from
Introduce IPv6 Prefix delegation state machine according to RFC 3633
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3633.
Add handle_dhcpv6_reply controller action to parse advertise/reply from
IPv6 delegation server. Advertise/reply are parsed running respectively:
- pinctrl_parse_dhcv6_advt
-
Introduce logical flows in ovn router pipeline in order to parse dhcpv6
advertise/reply from IPv6 prefix delegation router.
Do not overwrite ipv6_ra_pd_list info in options column of SB port_binding
table written by ovn-controller
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi
---
northd/ovn-northd.c | 69
'dpdkr' a.k.a. DPDK ring ports has really poor support in OVS and not
tested on a regular basis. These ports are intended to work via
shared memory with another DPDK secondary process, but there are lots
of limitations for using this functionality in practice. Most of them
connected with running
Currently OVS maintains explicit packet drop/error counters only on port level.
Packets that are dropped as part of normal OpenFlow processing are counted in
flow stats of “drop” flows or as table misses in table stats. These can only be
interpreted by controllers that know the semantics of the
Hello Eli,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 4:36 PM Eli Britstein wrote:
>
> Currently, netdev datapath offload only accelerates the flow match
> sequence by associating a mark per flow. This series introduces the full
> offload of netdev datapath flows by having the HW also perform the flow
> actions.
>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:23 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 24.11.2019 21:38, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:04 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > Rather than exclude a set of flags, I would touch/copy only the flags
> > that OVS uses/understands.
> >
> > When OVS
Hi Dear, How are you doing out there? I am Anita, I want to meet you,
reply me for me to tell you why I want to meet you, introduce myself
fully to you and send you my pictures to know
me better. Thanks, Miss Anita.
___
dev mailing list
Bleep bloop. Greetings taoyunxi...@cmss.chinamobile.com, I am a robot and I
have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
git-am:
error: patch failed: utilities/ovn-nbctl.c:5346
error: utilities/ovn-nbctl.c:
>
> Hi Ciara and Ian,
>
> I'm checking the zero-copy support on both rx/tx side when
> using ovs-dpdk with vhostuser and dpdkport.
> Assuming PVP, IIUC[1,2], the rx (P to V) does not have zero-copy and
> the V to P has zero copy support by enabling dq-zero-copy.
>
> Am I understanding this
On 11/20/2019 2:04 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 03:37:17PM +0200, Roi Dayan wrote:
>> From: Paul Blakey
>>
>> Move all that is needed to identify a tc filter to a
>> new structure, tc_id. This removes a lot of duplication
>> in accessing/creating tc filters.
>>
>>
Доброго дня
Добавьте любые вакантные места на своем предприятии здесь http://bit.ly/2QNLIEM
Это без оплаты и крутая отдача от публикации!
---
Просьба перешлите настоящее предложение в отдел персонала
___
dev mailing list
Please help me reviewing the code, thanks very much.
At 2019-10-28 20:44:51, "zhaozhanxu" wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I already modified some of them, and I think the others
need to discuss.
V2===>V3:
1. Make the n_offload_packets to be a subset of n_packets, and n_offload_bytes
to be
Add a way to delete QoS by its name or uuid
Currently, qos can only be deleted by indirect way which must designate
switch or more parameters. This patch change the original "qos-del" to
"ls-qos-del", and add a new "qos-del" command. By the new command, you
can delete qos by uuid or name of
Add "name" column of QoS table
Add "name" column of QoS table and make qos could be list
by command "ovn-nbctl list qos "name"".
Signed-off-by: Yunxiang Tao
diff --git a/ovn-nb.ovsschema b/ovn-nb.ovsschema
index 12999a466..02ae48e73 100644
--- a/ovn-nb.ovsschema
+++ b/ovn-nb.ovsschema
@@
Currently, qos can only be deleted by indirect way which must designate
switch or more parameters. The first patch add "name" column to QoS table,
and make QoS table could be listed by "name" witch comand
"ovn-nbctl list qos "name"".
The second patch change the original "qos-del" to
56 matches
Mail list logo
