Thanks for your response, ben,
I found these error logs will occur with hw-offload=true, This error will
disappear when I disable hardware offload.
It seems there is a bug processing igmp packet when hardware offload enabled.
I'm not familiar with this code, Could you provide any clue how to deb
Hi,
Continue this thread with some updates.
I finally got 4096 networks and 256 router created, 16 networks connecting
to each router. All routers are set as external gateway.
On underlay, those 256 gateway addresses on the provider network are
reachable. Ping is steady.
I launched 10 VMs on on
syzbot has bisected this issue to:
commit 9bf24f594c6acf676fb8c229f152c21bfb915ddb
Author: Eelco Chaudron
Date: Fri Jul 31 12:21:34 2020 +
net: openvswitch: make masks cache size configurable
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=110e06dc90
start commit: 2
In that case, I can use set-connection to set one row.
Thanks!
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Han Zhou
> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 4:44 PM
> To: Tony Liu
> Cc: Numan Siddique ; Han Zhou ; ovs-
> discuss ; ovs-dev
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [OVN] no response to inactivity pro
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:50 PM Tony Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I have 3 OVN DB nodes, should I add 3 rows in connection table
> for the inactivity_probe? Or put 3 addresses into one row?
>
> "set-connection" set one row only, and there is no "add-connection".
> How should I add 3 rows into the ta
Hi Han,
Sounds good. I am looking forward to incremental-processing,
and will go from there.
BTW, it would be great if you could let me know how to set probe
interval for 3-node cluster, here or in another thread.
Thanks!
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Han Zhou
> Sent: Tuesday, Au
Hi Tony,
I am glad it is more clear now. For your concern regarding taking too much
time for one round of computing, it is valid, but I guess it is not
directly related to the IDLE probe any more, right?
The OVSDB IDL in fact already does some of the work of caping and buffering
like what you prop
Hi,
Since I have 3 OVN DB nodes, should I add 3 rows in connection table
for the inactivity_probe? Or put 3 addresses into one row?
"set-connection" set one row only, and there is no "add-connection".
How should I add 3 rows into the table connection?
Thanks!
Tony
> -Original Message-
Bleep bloop. Greetings svc.mail.git, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Empty return followed by brace, consider omitting
#50 FILE: northd/ovn-northd.c:8268:
Hi Han,
Thanks for clarifications! It's crystal clear.
My concern, in general, is blocking. For onv-northd, or OVSDB client,
(I assume all OVSDB clients are using the same library for connection,
proble, etc.?) when handing current event, it won't be interrupted to
handle any incoming event, righ
Bleep bloop. Greetings svc.mail.git, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Improper whitespace around control block
#186 FILE: utilities/ovn-nbctl.c:861:
N
Hi Numan,
Just submitted V4. Appreciate your feedback.
Regards,
Ankur
From: Numan Siddique
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 2:45 AM
To: svc.mail.git
Cc: ovs-dev
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2 ovn] External IP based NAT
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:55 AM Ankur
From: Ankur Sharma
Another term for this feature is destination based NAT,
especially in the context of SNAT.
Current NAT implementation is OVN endpoint ip based.
For example,
# ovn-nbctl lr-nat-list router
TYPE EXTERNAL_IPLOGICAL_IP
snat 10.15.24.135 50.0.
From: Ankur Sharma
This patch adds following columns to NAT table.
a. applied_ext_ips:
Represents Address Set of External IPs for which
a NAT rule is applicable.
b. exempted_ext_ips:
Represents Address Set of External IPs for which
a NAT rule is NOT applicable.
Additionally, patch
From: Ankur Sharma
This patch has northd changes which consumes applied/exempted external ip
configuration per NAT rule in logical flow.
Applied/Exempted external ip range adds an additional match criteria in
snat/dnat/unsnat/undant logical flow rules.
For example, if an allowed_external_ip add
Witam!
Czy otrzymałeś poprzednią wiadomość, którą dla Ciebie wysłaliśmy? Jesteśmy
Światową Organizacją Zdrowia czekamy na odpowiedź tak szybko, jak to możliwe.
Biuro Dyrektora Generalnego
Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia
___
dev mailing list
d...@op
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:40 AM Tony Liu wrote:
> Inline...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tony
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Han Zhou
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 11:01 AM
> > To: Numan Siddique ; Ben Pfaff ; Leonid
> > Ryzhyk
> > Cc: Tony Liu ; Han Zhou ; ovs-
> > dev ; ovs-discuss
> > Subj
syzbot has bisected this issue to:
commit 9bf24f594c6acf676fb8c229f152c21bfb915ddb
Author: Eelco Chaudron
Date: Fri Jul 31 12:21:34 2020 +
net: openvswitch: make masks cache size configurable
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=17461dea90
start commit: 2
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:31 AM Tony Liu wrote:
> Is there any difference to restore DB on existing cluster vs. fresh
> cluster,
> in terms of performance?
>
> If I don't have to restore on fresh cluster, which is recommended?
>
> I would suggest to directly restore on top of existing cluster ins
Inline...
Thanks!
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Han Zhou
> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 11:01 AM
> To: Numan Siddique ; Ben Pfaff ; Leonid
> Ryzhyk
> Cc: Tony Liu ; Han Zhou ; ovs-
> dev ; ovs-discuss
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] [OVN] ovn-northd takes much CPU when no
> configura
Is there any difference to restore DB on existing cluster vs. fresh cluster,
in terms of performance?
If I don't have to restore on fresh cluster, which is recommended?
For now, since ovn-northd always recomputes the whole DB, I guess not much
difference?
With incremental-process, would restorin
On 8/4/20 5:31 PM, William Tu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:24 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 8/4/20 3:19 PM, William Tu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:23 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 7/30/20 12:44 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Ilya Maximets (2):
> Set release date
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:30 AM Tony Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is how I restore OVN DB.
> * Stop all ovn-nb-db, ovn-sb-db and ovn-northd services.
> * Clean up all DB files.
> * Start all DB services. Fresh ovn-nb-db and ovn-sb-db clusters are up and
> running.
> * Set DB election timer to 10s.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:38 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:02 AM Tony Liu wrote:
>
>> The probe awakes recomputing?
>> There is probe every 5 seconds. Without any connection up/down or
>> failover,
>> ovn-northd will recompute everything every 5 seconds, no matter what?
Hi,
Here is how I restore OVN DB.
* Stop all ovn-nb-db, ovn-sb-db and ovn-northd services.
* Clean up all DB files.
* Start all DB services. Fresh ovn-nb-db and ovn-sb-db clusters are up and
running.
* Set DB election timer to 10s.
* Restore DB to ovn-nb-db by ovsdb-client.
* Start all ovn-north
Thanks Numan for looking into it!
Probe is for health check only, it's not supposed to trigger translation,
even with incremental implementation. Translation should be triggered only
when a ovn-northd becomes active.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Numan Siddique
> Sent: Tuesday, Augu
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:55:19AM +, Frank Wang(王培辉) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found there are many error logs as follows in ovs-vswitchd.log:
> Aug 4 18:48:03 node-170 ovs-vswitchd:
> ovs|00100|odp_util(handler171)|ERR|internal error parsing flow key
> recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0),skb_prior
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit:2f631133 net: Pass NULL to skb_network_protocol() when we ..
git tree: net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12c1f77090
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=91a13b78c7dc258d
das
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit:2f631133 net: Pass NULL to skb_network_protocol() when we ..
git tree: net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12daae2a90
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=91a13b78c7dc258d
das
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:24 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 8/4/20 3:19 PM, William Tu wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:23 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/30/20 12:44 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ilya Maximets (2):
> >>> Set release date for 2.13.1.
> >>> Prepare for 2.13.2.
Dear friend,
I am Mr Roth Savuth and a personal Accountant Director with Foreign Trade Bank
of Cambodia (FTB). It is with good spirit of heart that I open up this great
opportunity to you. A deceased client of mine that shares the same name as
yours died as a result of heart-related condition o
On 8/4/20 3:19 PM, William Tu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:23 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 7/30/20 12:44 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>>
>>> Ilya Maximets (2):
>>> Set release date for 2.13.1.
>>> Prepare for 2.13.2.
>>>
>>> NEWS | 14 +-
>>> configure.ac |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:23 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 7/30/20 12:44 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > Ilya Maximets (2):
> > Set release date for 2.13.1.
> > Prepare for 2.13.2.
> >
> > NEWS | 14 +-
> > configure.ac | 2 +-
> > debian/changelog | 8 +++-
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:42 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:42 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:44 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:44 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:43 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:44 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:45 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:45 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:45 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:45 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:45 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:46 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 3:46 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
LGTM,
Acked-by: William Tu
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Hello,
I found there are many error logs as follows in ovs-vswitchd.log:
Aug 4 18:48:03 node-170 ovs-vswitchd:
ovs|00100|odp_util(handler171)|ERR|internal error parsing flow key
recirc_id(0),dp_hash(0),skb_priority(0),in_port(5),skb_mark(0),ct_state(0),c
t_zone(0),ct_label(0),eth(src=6c:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:37 PM Roi Dayan wrote:
>
> There is no need to pass tc rules to hw when just probing
> for tc features. this will avoid redundant errors from hw drivers
> that may happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan
> Acked-By: Vlad Buslov
Reviewed-by: Tonghao Zhang
> ---
>
> Notes:
>
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:02 AM Tony Liu wrote:
> The probe awakes recomputing?
> There is probe every 5 seconds. Without any connection up/down or failover,
> ovn-northd will recompute everything every 5 seconds, no matter what?
> Really?
>
> Anyways, I will increase the probe interval for now, s
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:12 AM Tony Liu wrote:
> In my deployment, on each Neutron server, there are 13 Neutron server
> processes.
> I see 12 of them (monitor, maintenance, RPC, API) connect to both ovn-nb-db
> and ovn-sb-db. With 3 Neutron server nodes, that's 36 OVSDB clients.
> Is so many cli
From: Numan Siddique
Presently when a logical switch has load balancer(s) associated to it, then the
packet is still sent to conntrack with the action ct_lb on both the ingress
and egress logical switch pipeline even if the destination IP is not LB VIP.
This is because below logical flows are hi
From: Numan Siddique
If there is a logical port 'P1' with the IP - 10.0.0.3 and a logical port 'P2'
with
the IP 20.0.0.3 and if the logical switch of 'P1' has atleast one load balancer
associated with it and atleast one ACL with allow-related action associated
with it.
Then for every packet fro
Добрый день!
Предлагаем ОПТОВЫЕ ПОСТАВКИ средств индивидуальной защиты.
Мы продолжаем работать и радуемся открытию бизнеса вместе с Вами!
Наша команда предлагает специальные цены на самую популярную продукцию СИЗ:
маски, перчатки, антисептики, рециркуляторы, костюмы, термометры и многое
друго
58 matches
Mail list logo
