On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:44 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> In commit f9cab11d5fabe2ae321a3b4bad5972b61df958c0, a LOG_TO_PHY flow
> was changed so that it was no longer associated with a particular port
> binding. The logic there was that the particular flow contains data
> pertaining to the port bi
From: wenxu
Check overlap between current pedit key, which is always 4 bytes
(range [off, off + 3]), and a map entry in flower_pedit_map
sf = ROUND_DOWN(mf, 4) (range [sf|mf, (mf + sz - 1)|ef]).
So for the tos the rewite the off + 3(3) is greater than mf,
and should less than ef(4) but not mf+sz
我已邀请您填写以下表单：
在线挖掘采购信息
要填写此表单，请访问：
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd2yJxTOYWWewvfJO9rjD6EDLUVymvM9_iQDGH_NXwQvuOcuQ/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1&flr=0&usp=mail_form_link
我已邀请您填写表单：
Google表单：创建调查问卷并分析调查结果。
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
ht
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:36:39 +0100 Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:12 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:04:04 -0500 Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> > > Currently, the openvswitch module is not accepting the correctly formated
> > > netlink message for the TTL decrement
Flavio, thank you so much for clarification, I'll push "Enable VXLAN TSO for
DPDK datapath" first, replies for your comments inline, please check them in
the later part.
-邮件原件-
发件人: dev [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] 代表 Flavio Leitner
发送时间: 2020年11月24日 3:10
收件人: yang_y_yi
抄送:
--
The corona virus outbreak isn't just a major health crisis it's also a large
economic disruption leading to people losing their jobs and making it harder to
take care of their families. We've heard that a little financial support can go
a long way.
I'm Sheryll Goedert from Florida the Wi
From 417ed338179d9856334e9b738abd71952581785a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Neuman
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 21:02:08 +
Subject: [PATCH branch-2.11] stream-ssl: Make 'stream_ssl_set_key_and_cert'
atomic
When attempting to set the SSL key and cert via this function,
first we check wheth
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 08:03:08PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> TL;DR OVS can not use Travis CI anymore. So, we need a new CI provider.
> GitHub Actions looks like a sane replacement.
Ilya, thank you for doing all of the research here and presenting all of
it so thoroughly and clearly. It sound
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:12 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:04:04 -0500 Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> > Currently, the openvswitch module is not accepting the correctly formated
> > netlink message for the TTL decrement action. For both setting and getting
> > the dec_ttl action, t
Ilya Maximets writes:
> Hi.
>
> TL;DR OVS can not use Travis CI anymore. So, we need a new CI provider.
> GitHub Actions looks like a sane replacement.
>
>
> As you, probably, noticed our Travis CI builds are taking lots of time to
> start
> and work. This is because of reduced capacity for tr
Hi Yi,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:16:49AM +0800, yang_y_yi wrote:
>
>
> Thanks a lot, Flavio, please check inline comments for more discussion.
>
>
>
> At 2020-10-31 01:55:57, "Flavio Leitner" wrote:
> >
> >Hi Yi,
> >
> >Thanks for the patch and sorry the delay to review it.
> >See my comm
Hi.
TL;DR OVS can not use Travis CI anymore. So, we need a new CI provider.
GitHub Actions looks like a sane replacement.
As you, probably, noticed our Travis CI builds are taking lots of time to start
and work. This is because of reduced capacity for travic-ci.org users.
What happened to tr
On 19/11/2020 08:44, Mark Gray wrote:
> Update build system to ensure dirs.py is created when it is a
> dependency for a build target. Also, update setup.py to
> check for that dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Gray
FWIW: Here is a link to a passing travis build:
https://travis-ci.com/github/
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:08 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> When a port binding of type "l3gateway" is claimed its remote peer
> port_binding is also stored in local_datapath.peer_ports[].remote.
>
> If the remote peer port_binding is deleted first (i.e., before the local
> "l3gateway" one) then we n
Ilya Maximets writes:
> This is a unit test for the overflow detection issue fixed by commit
> a1d2c5f5d9ed ("sha1: Fix algorithm for data bigger than 512 megabytes.")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
> ---
Acked-by: Paolo Valerio
Tested-by: Paolo Valerio
I would expect such checks to be commented as indeed it was not clear why
it was there. I looked in similar places where FLOW_TNL_F_UDPIF is used
and there is no such check. The commit which created this condition is
quite large so I am not able to conclude from that.
I assume this is an optimizat
Too big userdata could overflow netlink message leading to out-of-bound
memory accesses or assertion while formatting nested actions.
Fix that by checking the saize and returning correct error code.
Credit to OSS-Fuzz.
Reported-at: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=27640
Fixe
On 11/23/20 9:37 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> When idl removes orphan rows, those rows are inserted into the
> 'track_list'. This allows iterators such as *_FOR_EACH_TRACKED () to
> return orphan rows that never had any data to the IDL user. In this
> case, it is difficult for the user to understan
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:35 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 11/20/20 6:52 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > On 11/20/20 6:12 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >> On 11/20/20 1:17 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>> Fixes: 742474bad730 ("ovn-nbctl: Enhance lr-policy-add to set the
> >>> options.")
> >>> Signed-of
When idl removes orphan rows, those rows are inserted into the
'track_list'. This allows iterators such as *_FOR_EACH_TRACKED () to
return orphan rows that never had any data to the IDL user. In this
case, it is difficult for the user to understand whether it is a row
with no data (there was no "
20 matches
Mail list logo
